Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

{toolchain} intel/2021.07 #13639

Conversation

SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member

(created using eb --new-pr)
Candidate for intel/2021b

…compilers-2021.3.0.eb i/impi/impi-2021.3.0-intel-compilers-2021.3.0.eb i/iimpi/iimpi-2021.07.eb i/imkl/imkl-2021.3.0-iimpi-2021.07.eb h/HPL/HPL-2.3-intel-2021.07.eb u/UCX/UCX-1.11.0-GCCcore-11.2.0.eb n/numactl/numactl-2.0.14-GCCcore-11.2.0.eb
@SebastianAchilles SebastianAchilles added this to the 4.x milestone Aug 6, 2021
@SebastianAchilles SebastianAchilles added the 2021b issues & PRs related to 2021b label Aug 6, 2021
@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member Author

Test report by @SebastianAchilles
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 8 out of 8 (8 easyconfigs in total)
centos8-eb - Linux centos linux 8.3.2011, x86_64, Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8700 CPU @ 3.20GHz (skylake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/6f6598696d5aa5b469fc7a635b445fc4 for a full test report.

@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member Author

Test report by @SebastianAchilles
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 8 out of 8 (8 easyconfigs in total)
jwvis00.juwels - Linux centos linux 8.3.2011, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6148 CPU @ 2.40GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/99986375c48546f4ad65e09f1e7c3029 for a full test report.

@@ -26,10 +23,10 @@ checksums = [
'c4553f7e707be8e8e196f625e4e7fbc8eff5474f64ab85fc7146b5ed53ebc87c', # l_fortran-compiler_p_2021.3.0.3168_offline.sh
]

local_gccver = '10.3.0'
local_gccver = '11.2.0'
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@robert-mijakovic Heads-up: we're bumping this because the plan is to use GCC 11.2 as a base for foss/2021b and intel/2021b

boegel
boegel previously approved these changes Aug 6, 2021
Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Aug 6, 2021

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso

PR test command 'EB_PR=13639 EB_ARGS= /apps/slurm/default/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_13639 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 17923

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 894162503 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member Author

Test report by @SebastianAchilles
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 8 out of 8 (8 easyconfigs in total)
jwvis00.juwels - Linux centos linux 8.3.2011, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6148 CPU @ 2.40GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/bfd7d44b3020e14c9024eccfd1150d55 for a full test report.

@SebastianAchilles SebastianAchilles marked this pull request as draft August 6, 2021 18:44
@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Aug 10, 2021

@SebastianAchilles Can you clarify why you marked this as a draft? Is it to look into the compatibility of intel-compiler 2021.3 with GCC 11.2?

@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member Author

@SebastianAchilles Can you clarify why you marked this as a draft? Is it to look into the compatibility of intel-compiler 2021.3 with GCC 11.2?

Marked this as a draft, because I want to wait until we know more about the compatibility of intel-compiler 2021.3 with GCC 11.2.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Sep 1, 2021

@SebastianAchilles We have (unofficial) confirmation now that Intel compilers 2021.3 should work fine on top of GCC 11.2, right?

@boegel boegel modified the milestones: 4.x, next release (4.4.2?) Sep 1, 2021
@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member Author

@SebastianAchilles We have (unofficial) confirmation now that Intel compilers 2021.3 should work fine on top of GCC 11.2, right?

Intel compiler 2021.3.0 is not compatible with GCC 11.2.0

@akesandgren
Copy link
Contributor

Any details on the non-compatability?

@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member Author

Any details on the non-compatability?

Unfortunately I do not know why it is not compatible.

@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member Author

Test report by @SebastianAchilles
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 6 out of 6 (6 easyconfigs in total)
rocky8-eb - Linux rocky linux 8.4, x86_64, Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6900K CPU @ 3.20GHz (broadwell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/005dc3145a9dc46fb49b380bf50681c6 for a full test report.

@akesandgren
Copy link
Contributor

So just an answer from Intel or an actual example that fails to build/run?

@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member Author

Test report by @SebastianAchilles
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 6 out of 6 (6 easyconfigs in total)
jwvis00.juwels - Linux centos linux 8.4.2105, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6148 CPU @ 2.40GHz (skylake_avx512), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/739a2f213528cb0e05eb9900881d16ef for a full test report.

@boegel boegel modified the milestones: 4.4.2, release after 4.4.2 Sep 2, 2021
@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Sep 4, 2021

So just an answer from Intel or an actual example that fails to build/run?

Official word from Intel is that GCC 11.2 will only be supported in the upcoming 2021.4 release of the Intel compilers.

@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member Author

Closing this PR, because I don't think this is a good candidate for intel/2021b.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2021b issues & PRs related to 2021b update
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants