Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

GCC 6.4.0 + binutils 2.28 (base for */2017b toolchains) #4794

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 5, 2017
Merged

GCC 6.4.0 + binutils 2.28 (base for */2017b toolchains) #4794

merged 4 commits into from
Jul 5, 2017

Conversation

boegel
Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel commented Jun 28, 2017

(created using eb --new-pr)

@boegel boegel added this to the 3.3.1 milestone Jun 28, 2017
boegel
boegel commented Jun 28, 2017
View reviewed changes
easybuild/easyconfigs/g/GCCcore/GCCcore-6.4.0.eb Outdated
]

sources = [
'gcc-%(version)s-RC-20170628.tar.gz', # FIXME 'gcc-%(version)s.tar.bz2',
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

currently testing with release candidate for GCC 6.4.0, this needs to be changed before merging

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

final release is expected next week, see https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-06/msg00131.html

This was referenced Jun 28, 2017
Merged
Merged
@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Jun 28, 2017

Because the release candidate for GCC 6.4.0 uses 6.3.1 as version internally, the sanity check for GCCcore currently fails.
This should be fixed once the proper release is used instead.

@boegel boegel changed the title GCC 6.4.0 + binutils 2.28 (base for */2017b toolchains) [WIP] GCC 6.4.0 + binutils 2.28 (base for */2017b toolchains) Jul 4, 2017
@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Jul 4, 2017

@wpoely86 please review?

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Jul 4, 2017

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 8 out of 8 (8 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2075.delcatty.os - Linux centos linux 7.3.1611, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/990dc362393ea39c28db48353b6b76c7 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Jul 4, 2017

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 8 out of 8 (8 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2699.swalot.os - Linux centos linux 7.3.1611, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v3 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/81ea917a3c486ab48fba49f443ba0a85 for a full test report.

@boegel boegel mentioned this pull request Jul 5, 2017
Merged
@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Jul 5, 2017

@easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs-maintainers good to go?

vanzod
vanzod requested changes Jul 5, 2017
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@vanzod vanzod left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing checksum in binutils-2.28-GCCcore-6.4.0.eb

@vanzod
Copy link
Member

vanzod commented Jul 5, 2017

Test report by @vanzod
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 8 out of 8 (8 easyconfigs in this PR)
cermis - Linux debian 8.8, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz, Python 2.7.9
See https://gist.github.com/2e8fb0a53901f95b3fac5a3526c92efe for a full test report.

@vanzod vanzod merged commit 3a7ece7 into easybuilders:develop Jul 5, 2017
@vanzod
Copy link
Member

vanzod commented Jul 5, 2017

Thanks @boegel

@boegel boegel deleted the 20170628170448_new_pr_GCC640 branch July 5, 2017 20:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@vanzod vanzod vanzod approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
3.3.1
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@boegel @vanzod