DaaLoadTest MathLoadTest MiniMix crash vmState=0x000514ff vmState=0x000509ff #19947
Labels
Comments
pshipton
added
comp:jit
test failure
blocker
segfault
pshipton
added this to the Release 0.48 (Java 8, 11, 17, 21, 23) October refresh milestone
|
@hzongaro can someone take a look at this with priority pls. It seems it may be responsible for taking AIX machines offline due to the amount of output. There is 800MB of console output from the backtraces, which I assume is blocking capturing any core file. |
pshipton
changed the title
pshipton
added a commit
to pshipton/openjdk-tests
that referenced
this issue
Jul 31, 2024
Issue eclipse-openj9/openj9#19947 Signed-off-by: Peter Shipton <[email protected]>
|
See #19947 (comment) |
|
Also on zlinux https://openj9-jenkins.osuosl.org/job/Test_openjdk11_j9_special.system_s390x_linux_Personal_testList_0/178/ 17:48:17 MiniMix_3h_0 https://openj9-jenkins.osuosl.org/job/Test_openjdk11_j9_special.system_s390x_linux_Personal_testList_1/178/ https://openj9-jenkins.osuosl.org/job/Test_openjdk8_j9_special.system_s390x_linux_Personal_testList_3/122 |
pshipton
changed the title
|
For the time being I'm disabling the special.system test runs on AIX and zlinux. I've also added back x86_mac, aarch64_mac and xlinux, which were previously disabled due to infra problems. |
|
@midronij, is it possible this is related to your recent changes from pull request #17969? Looking at the jitdump from https://openj9-artifactory.osuosl.org/artifactory/ci-openj9/Test/Test_openjdk11_j9_special.system_s390x_linux_Personal_testList_0/178/system_test_output.tar.gz, it looks like the crash is happening while processing a call to |
|
https://openj9-jenkins.osuosl.org/job/Test_openjdk23_j9_sanity.openjdk_x86-64_linux_Nightly_testList_0/25/ |
|
The tests aren't really excluded, but I've set |
|
Although the open testing is limited, the tests are failing on all platforms except for aarch64. |
This was referenced Aug 1, 2024
pshipton
removed this from the Release 0.48 (Java 8, 11, 17, 21, 23) October refresh milestone
|
Reverted the suspected change causing the problem. |
midronij
pushed a commit
to midronij/openj9
that referenced
this issue
Aug 30, 2024
A crash was occuring in Unsafe.get/put() case (6) when trying to modify the CFG to include the newly generated directAccessBlock. To avoid this, we can simply append the directAccessTreeTop onto the previous block (beforeCallBlock), which elimiates the need to update the CFG, since no new blocks are added. Additionally, without this commit, these two blocks (in addition to the one after the directAccessBlock, joinBlock), would get merged during block simplication anyways: so this fix eliminates the need to perform that optimization later down the line. Signed-off-by: midronij <[email protected]>
midronij
added a commit
to midronij/openj9
that referenced
this issue
Aug 30, 2024
A crash was occuring in Unsafe.get/put() case (6) when trying to modify the CFG to include the newly generated directAccessBlock. To avoid this, we can simply append the directAccessTreeTop onto the previous block (beforeCallBlock), which elimiates the need to update the CFG, since no new blocks are added. Additionally, without this commit, these two blocks (in addition to the one after the directAccessBlock, joinBlock), would get merged during block simplication anyways: so this fix eliminates the need to perform that optimization later down the line. Signed-off-by: midronij <[email protected]>
midronij
added a commit
to midronij/openj9
that referenced
this issue
Aug 30, 2024
A crash was occuring in Unsafe.get/put() case (6) when trying to modify the CFG to include the newly generated directAccessBlock. To avoid this, we can simply append the directAccessTreeTop onto the previous block (beforeCallBlock), which elimiates the need to update the CFG, since no new blocks are added. Additionally, without this commit, these two blocks (in addition to the one after the directAccessBlock, joinBlock), would get merged during block simplication anyways: so this fix eliminates the need to perform that optimization later down the line. Signed-off-by: midronij <[email protected]>
rmnattas
pushed a commit
to rmnattas/openj9
that referenced
this issue
Aug 30, 2024
A crash was occuring in Unsafe.get/put() case (6) when trying to modify the CFG to include the newly generated directAccessBlock. To avoid this, we can simply append the directAccessTreeTop onto the previous block (beforeCallBlock), which elimiates the need to update the CFG, since no new blocks are added. Additionally, without this commit, these two blocks (in addition to the one after the directAccessBlock, joinBlock), would get merged during block simplication anyways: so this fix eliminates the need to perform that optimization later down the line. Signed-off-by: midronij <[email protected]>
rmnattas
pushed a commit
to rmnattas/openj9
that referenced
this issue
Sep 5, 2024
A crash was occuring in Unsafe.get/put() case (6) when trying to modify the CFG to include the newly generated directAccessBlock. To avoid this, we can simply append the directAccessTreeTop onto the previous block (beforeCallBlock), which elimiates the need to update the CFG, since no new blocks are added. Additionally, without this commit, these two blocks (in addition to the one after the directAccessBlock, joinBlock), would get merged during block simplication anyways: so this fix eliminates the need to perform that optimization later down the line. Signed-off-by: midronij <[email protected]>
rmnattas
pushed a commit
to rmnattas/openj9
that referenced
this issue
Sep 5, 2024
A crash was occuring in Unsafe.get/put() case (6) when trying to modify the CFG to include the newly generated directAccessBlock. To avoid this, we can simply append the directAccessTreeTop onto the previous block (beforeCallBlock), which elimiates the need to update the CFG, since no new blocks are added. Additionally, without this commit, these two blocks (in addition to the one after the directAccessBlock, joinBlock), would get merged during block simplication anyways: so this fix eliminates the need to perform that optimization later down the line. Signed-off-by: midronij <[email protected]>
rmnattas
pushed a commit
to rmnattas/openj9
that referenced
this issue
Sep 5, 2024
A crash was occuring in Unsafe.get/put() case (6) when trying to modify the CFG to include the newly generated directAccessBlock. To avoid this, we can simply append the directAccessTreeTop onto the previous block (beforeCallBlock), which elimiates the need to update the CFG, since no new blocks are added. Additionally, without this commit, these two blocks (in addition to the one after the directAccessBlock, joinBlock), would get merged during block simplication anyways: so this fix eliminates the need to perform that optimization later down the line. Signed-off-by: midronij <[email protected]>
rmnattas
pushed a commit
to rmnattas/openj9
that referenced
this issue
Sep 5, 2024
A crash was occuring in Unsafe.get/put() case (6) when trying to modify the CFG to include the newly generated directAccessBlock. To avoid this, we can simply append the directAccessTreeTop onto the previous block (beforeCallBlock), which elimiates the need to update the CFG, since no new blocks are added. Additionally, without this commit, these two blocks (in addition to the one after the directAccessBlock, joinBlock), would get merged during block simplication anyways: so this fix eliminates the need to perform that optimization later down the line. Signed-off-by: midronij <[email protected]>
rmnattas
pushed a commit
to rmnattas/openj9
that referenced
this issue
Sep 5, 2024
A crash was occuring in Unsafe.get/put() case (6) when trying to modify the CFG to include the newly generated directAccessBlock. To avoid this, we can simply append the directAccessTreeTop onto the previous block (beforeCallBlock), which elimiates the need to update the CFG, since no new blocks are added. Additionally, without this commit, these two blocks (in addition to the one after the directAccessBlock, joinBlock), would get merged during block simplication anyways: so this fix eliminates the need to perform that optimization later down the line. Signed-off-by: midronij <[email protected]>
luke-li-2003
pushed a commit
to luke-li-2003/openj9
that referenced
this issue
Sep 23, 2024
A crash was occuring in Unsafe.get/put() case (6) when trying to modify the CFG to include the newly generated directAccessBlock. To avoid this, we can simply append the directAccessTreeTop onto the previous block (beforeCallBlock), which elimiates the need to update the CFG, since no new blocks are added. Additionally, without this commit, these two blocks (in addition to the one after the directAccessBlock, joinBlock), would get merged during block simplication anyways: so this fix eliminates the need to perform that optimization later down the line. Signed-off-by: midronij <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Related to https://github.ibm.com/runtimes/infrastructure/issues/9201
vmState [0x514ff]: {J9VMSTATE_JIT} {globalValuePropagation}https://openj9-jenkins.osuosl.org/job/Test_openjdk17_j9_special.system_ppc64_aix_Personal_testList_1/133/
DaaLoadTest_daa1_special_5m_11 Mode351
-Xgcpolicy:metronome -XcompressedrefsvmState [0x509ff]: {J9VMSTATE_JIT} {localValuePropagation}DaaLoadTest_daa2_special_5m_11
There are more failures on AIX, all versions. They are hard to look at since the output is so big.
https://openj9-jenkins.osuosl.org/job/Test_openjdk8_j9_special.system_ppc64_aix_Personal/122/
https://openj9-jenkins.osuosl.org/job/Test_openjdk11_j9_special.system_ppc64_aix_Personal/148/
https://openj9-jenkins.osuosl.org/job/Test_openjdk17_j9_special.system_ppc64_aix_Personal/133/
https://openj9-jenkins.osuosl.org/job/Test_openjdk21_j9_special.system_ppc64_aix_Personal/48/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: