Made all mgramseva changes into workbench-develop #1438
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve formatting improvements and the addition of a new function in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/workbench/src/pages/employee/MDMSEdit.js (1)
48-48: Consider refactoring the assignment in theforEachcallback.The static analysis tool flagged an assignment within an expression on this line. While this is a common pattern in JavaScript, it might be worth considering a more explicit approach for improved readability and to satisfy the linter.
You could refactor this line to be more explicit:
uniqueFields.forEach((field) => { updatesToUiSchema[field] = { "ui:readonly": true }; });This change separates the assignment from the
forEachcallback, making it clearer and potentially more maintainable.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 48-48: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/workbench/src/pages/employee/MDMSAddV2.js (1)
78-78: Simplify URL assignment using optional chainingThe ternary operator can be simplified by utilizing optional chaining and the logical OR operator for better readability.
Consider updating the code as follows:
- url: api ? api?.url : Digit.Utils.workbench.getMDMSActionURL(moduleName, masterName, "create"), + url: api?.url || Digit.Utils.workbench.getMDMSActionURL(moduleName, masterName, "create"),
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/workbench/src/pages/employee/MDMSAddV2.js (3 hunks)
- micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/workbench/src/pages/employee/MDMSEdit.js (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/workbench/src/pages/employee/MDMSAddV2.js (1)
Pattern
**/*.js: checkmicro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/workbench/src/pages/employee/MDMSEdit.js (1)
Pattern
**/*.js: check
🪛 Biome
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/workbench/src/pages/employee/MDMSAddV2.js
[error] 214-214: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 223-223: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 230-230: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/workbench/src/pages/employee/MDMSEdit.js
[error] 48-48: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
🔇 Additional comments (10)
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/workbench/src/pages/employee/MDMSEdit.js (7)
1-7: LGTM: Import statements and component declaration.The changes in this section are primarily formatting improvements. The import statements have been reorganized for better readability, and the component declaration remains functionally the same.
7-11: LGTM: Hook usage and query parameter extraction.The changes in this section are minor formatting improvements. The usage of hooks and extraction of query parameters remain functionally unchanged.
Line range hint
15-52: LGTM: State declarations and request criteria objects.The changes in this section are primarily formatting improvements that enhance readability. The state declarations remain unchanged. In the
reqCriteriaobject, a trailing comma has been added to theuniqueIdentifiersarray, which is a common JavaScript style preference and helps prevent errors when adding new items to the array in the future.
54-66: LGTM: Utility functionscloseToastandgotoView.The changes to the
closeToastandgotoViewfunctions are purely formatting improvements. They enhance readability and maintain consistent styling with the rest of the file. The functionality of both functions remains unchanged.
68-80: LGTM: API hook usage and mutation setup.The changes in this section are minor formatting improvements. The usage of custom API hooks for data fetching and the setup of the mutation hook for updating MDMS data remain functionally unchanged. The formatting enhances code readability.
Line range hint
82-115: LGTM:handleUpdatefunction with improved error handling.The changes to the
handleUpdatefunction are primarily formatting improvements that enhance readability. Additionally, there are some notable improvements:
- The success toast message now includes the
idfrom the response, providing more specific feedback.- The error message now includes the error code from the response, which can be helpful for debugging.
- The
closeToastcall in the error handler has been moved outside thesetShowToastcallback, ensuring it's always called after setting the toast.These changes improve the user feedback and error handling capabilities of the component.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 48-48: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
127-127: LGTM: Component export.The change to the component export statement is a minor formatting improvement that aligns with the overall code style of the file.
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/workbench/src/pages/employee/MDMSAddV2.js (3)
69-76: Initialization of request body is well-structuredThe
Mdmsobject within the request body is correctly structured and includes all necessary fields.
89-95: Review the necessity of the 2-second delay ingotoViewThe
setTimeoutingotoViewdelays navigation by 2 seconds. Ensure this delay is intentional and necessary for the user experience.If the delay is not required, consider removing it:
- setTimeout(() => { history.push( `/${window?.contextPath}/employee/workbench/mdms-view?moduleName=${moduleName}&masterName=${masterName}${from ? `&from=${from}` : ""}` ); - }, 2000); + }, 0);
248-248: Integration ofupdateAllPropertiesBasedOnUIOrderfunction looks goodThe schema is correctly updated by applying the
updateAllPropertiesBasedOnUIOrderfunction, ensuring that properties are ordered according to the UI specifications.
| if (isLoading || isLoadingSchema || renderLoader) return <Loader />; | ||
|
|
||
| if(isLoading || isLoadingSchema || renderLoader ) return <Loader /> | ||
|
|
||
| return ( | ||
| <React.Fragment> | ||
| <MDMSAdd defaultFormData = {data?.data} screenType={"edit"} onSubmitEditAction={handleUpdate} updatesToUISchema ={schemaData?.updatesToUiSchema} /> | ||
| {showToast && <Toast label={t(showToast.label)} error={showToast?.isError} onClose={()=>setShowToast(null)} ></Toast>} | ||
| <MDMSAdd defaultFormData={data?.data} screenType={"edit"} onSubmitEditAction={handleUpdate} updatesToUISchema={schemaData?.updatesToUiSchema} /> | ||
| {showToast && <Toast label={t(showToast.label)} error={showToast?.isError} onClose={() => setShowToast(null)}></Toast>} | ||
| </React.Fragment> | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Issue: updatesToUISchema prop is not handled in MDMSAdd component.
The MDMSEdit.js file passes the updatesToUISchema prop to the MDMSAdd component. However, the base MDMSAdd.js does not handle this prop, which may lead to unintended behavior.
- File:
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/workbench/src/pages/employee/MDMSAdd.js
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM: Rendering logic with a new prop.
The changes to the rendering logic are mostly formatting improvements that enhance readability. However, there's a notable change:
- The
MDMSAddcomponent now receives anupdatesToUISchemaprop derived fromschemaData.
This addition might affect the behavior of the MDMSAdd component.
Please verify that the MDMSAdd component correctly handles the updatesToUISchema prop and that it's being used as intended. You can run the following script to check the usage of this prop in the MDMSAdd component:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the usage of updatesToUISchema prop in MDMSAdd component
# Test: Search for the MDMSAdd component definition and its usage
rg --type js -A 10 'const MDMSAdd =' micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/workbench/src/pages/employee/
rg --type js -A 5 '<MDMSAdd' micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/workbench/src/pages/employee/
Length of output: 8525
|
|
||
| // Sort properties according to the orderArray | ||
| orderArray.forEach((key) => { | ||
| if (properties.hasOwnProperty(key)) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use Object.hasOwn() instead of hasOwnProperty
Accessing hasOwnProperty directly can be unsafe if the object has a custom hasOwnProperty property. It's recommended to use Object.hasOwn() for reliability.
Modify the code as follows:
- if (properties.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
+ if (Object.hasOwn(properties, key)) {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (properties.hasOwnProperty(key)) { | |
| if (Object.hasOwn(properties, key)) { |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 223-223: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
|
|
||
| // Add remaining properties that were not in the orderArray | ||
| for (let key in properties) { | ||
| if (!sortedProperties.hasOwnProperty(key)) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use Object.hasOwn() instead of hasOwnProperty
For consistency and to prevent potential issues, replace hasOwnProperty with Object.hasOwn().
Update the code:
- if (!sortedProperties.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
+ if (!Object.hasOwn(sortedProperties, key)) {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (!sortedProperties.hasOwnProperty(key)) { | |
| if (!Object.hasOwn(sortedProperties, key)) { |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 230-230: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
| let targetProperty = schema.definition.properties[propertyName]; | ||
|
|
||
| // Check if the property has items and the x-ui-schema with a ui:order field | ||
| if (targetProperty.items && targetProperty.items["x-ui-schema"] && targetProperty.items["x-ui-schema"]["ui:order"]) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor conditional check using optional chaining
The conditional statement can be simplified by using optional chaining, enhancing readability and reducing code complexity.
Update the condition as follows:
- if (targetProperty.items && targetProperty.items["x-ui-schema"] && targetProperty.items["x-ui-schema"]["ui:order"]) {
+ if (targetProperty.items?.["x-ui-schema"]?.["ui:order"]) {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (targetProperty.items && targetProperty.items["x-ui-schema"] && targetProperty.items["x-ui-schema"]["ui:order"]) { | |
| if (targetProperty.items?.["x-ui-schema"]?.["ui:order"]) { |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 214-214: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
No description provided.