Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HLM-5334/HLM-5550: Edit delivery rules, delivery screen ui fix and en… #241

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 1, 2024

Conversation

nabeelmd-eGov
Copy link
Contributor

@nabeelmd-eGov nabeelmd-eGov commented Apr 1, 2024

…hance

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new version of the stylesheet library for enhanced styling across the DIGIT application.
    • Added new styles for employee campaign management pages, including font weight and size adjustments.
    • Implemented new attribute and operator configurations in the campaign manager for improved data handling.
    • Integrated new UI components and state management improvements in campaign configuration pages for a more intuitive user experience.
    • Added functionality to dynamically handle campaign setup logic based on user input.
    • Enhanced delivery rule creation with new input handling logic, conditional rendering, and improved user feedback mechanisms.
  • Style

    • Updated and added styles across various components for visual consistency and emphasis on mandatory fields.
  • Refactor

    • Simplified import statements and updated state management logic in campaign manager modules for better maintainability and readability.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 1, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The recent updates across various files primarily enhance the DIGIT application's user interface and functionality. Notable changes include the integration of a new version of the @egovernments/digit-ui-css library, adjustments to styling in CSS files for better visual appeal, updates to campaign management configurations for improved data handling, and refinements in component behavior to ensure smoother operation and user experience.

Changes

Files Summary
.../example/public/index.html Updated to include new version 1.8.2-coreui.1 of @egovernments/digit-ui-css library.
.../css/src/pages/employee/campaignCycle.scss, .../css/src/pages/employee/index.scss Updated styling: added font weight and size, adjusted margins, and introduced .mandatory-span class.
.../campaign-manager/src/configs/attributeConfig.js, .../campaign-manager/src/configs/operatorConfig.js Updated attribute codes to proper case and added new "Gender" attribute and "EQUAL_TO" operator configuration.
.../campaign-manager/src/pages/employee/CycleConfiguration.js, .../campaign-manager/src/pages/employee/SetupCampaign.js, .../campaign-manager/src/pages/employee/deliveryRule/AddDeliverycontext.js, .../campaign-manager/src/pages/employee/deliveryRule/index.js Enhanced component functionality, introduced new state variables and logic for data handling, updated imports, and improved UI elements and interactions.

"In the realm of code and pixel sprites,
🐰 A rabbit hopped through bugs and bytes.
With each leap, a change was sown,
In DIGIT's land, progress shown.
Through fields of CSS and JS might,
It danced 'til the application took flight.
🌟 To better UIs, we take the fight,
With every hop, our goals in sight."

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review Status

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5ef9398 and 26f8b84.
Files ignored due to path filters (3)
  • micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/example/package.json is excluded by !**/*.json
  • micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/package.json is excluded by !**/*.json
  • micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/package.json is excluded by !**/*.json
Files selected for processing (9)
  • micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/example/public/index.html (1 hunks)
  • micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/css/src/pages/employee/campaignCycle.scss (3 hunks)
  • micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/css/src/pages/employee/index.scss (1 hunks)
  • micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/configs/attributeConfig.js (1 hunks)
  • micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/configs/operatorConfig.js (1 hunks)
  • micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/pages/employee/CycleConfiguration.js (4 hunks)
  • micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/pages/employee/SetupCampaign.js (4 hunks)
  • micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/pages/employee/deliveryRule/AddDeliverycontext.js (11 hunks)
  • micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/pages/employee/deliveryRule/index.js (2 hunks)
Additional Context Used
Path-based Instructions (6)
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/configs/attributeConfig.js (1)

**/*.js:
check

micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/configs/operatorConfig.js (1)

**/*.js:
check

micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/pages/employee/CycleConfiguration.js (1)

**/*.js:
check

micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/pages/employee/deliveryRule/index.js (1)

**/*.js:
check

micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/pages/employee/SetupCampaign.js (1)

**/*.js:
check

micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/pages/employee/deliveryRule/AddDeliverycontext.js (1)

**/*.js:
check

Additional comments not posted (23)
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/configs/attributeConfig.js (4)

4-4: The change to proper case for the "Age" attribute code is approved. It enhances consistency and readability.


8-8: The update to proper case for the "Height" attribute code is approved. Consistency in code naming conventions is important for maintainability.


12-12: The update to proper case for the "Weight" attribute code is approved. Consistent naming conventions aid in code clarity.


15-16: The addition of the "Gender" attribute is approved. It's a valuable addition for enhancing the application's functionality.

micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/configs/operatorConfig.js (1)

14-17: The addition of the "EQUAL_TO" operator configuration is approved. It's a logical extension that enhances the functionality of the application.

micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/css/src/pages/employee/index.scss (2)

22-27: The addition of styles for the .mandatory-span class is approved. Using red color and bold font weight is a common and effective practice for indicating required fields.


29-31: The adjustment to remove the bottom margin from .digit-employee-card-input.numeric is approved. Ensure to visually verify this change to confirm it achieves the desired layout improvement.

micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/example/public/index.html (1)

13-18: The update to include a new version (1.8.2-coreui.1) of the @egovernments/digit-ui-css library is approved. Ensure to verify the impact on the application's UI to confirm that the new styles or fixes are applied as expected.

micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/css/src/pages/employee/campaignCycle.scss (3)

71-73: The addition of font-weight: 700; to the .card-label class is approved. Making labels more prominent can improve readability and user experience.


164-164: The addition of font-size: 1rem; to h2 elements within .date-field-container is approved. Enhancing visibility and hierarchy of headings can improve the user interface.


181-183: The addition of font-size: 1rem; to h2 elements within .add-rule-btn is approved. Consistent font sizing across similar elements contributes to a cohesive user interface.

micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/pages/employee/deliveryRule/AddDeliverycontext.js (12)

7-7: The import of TextInput from @egovernments/digit-ui-components is a good change, ensuring consistency in using UI components from a centralized library. This aligns with best practices for maintainability and consistency across the application.


35-35: Adding the addedOption state is a significant change. It's crucial to ensure that this new state is properly managed throughout the component's lifecycle, especially in dynamic scenarios where delivery attributes might change. Consider adding comments or documentation to explain the purpose and usage of addedOption for future maintainability.


38-40: The useEffect hook correctly sets the addedOption state based on delivery attributes. This is a good practice for managing state dependencies on props or external data. Ensure that this hook behaves as expected in all scenarios, including edge cases where delivery might be null or have unexpected structures.


43-46: The modification in the selectValue function to prevent non-numeric inputs and certain characters is a good enhancement for input validation. However, ensure this logic does not inadvertently block valid inputs in certain locales or use cases. Adding a comment explaining the rationale behind blocking these specific characters would be helpful for future maintainability.


57-66: The addition of the selectGender function is a targeted enhancement for handling gender-specific logic. This is a good example of modularizing functionality for readability and maintainability. Ensure that the gender options are inclusive and consider externalizing them to a configuration file if they are used in multiple places across the application.


92-96: The logic to automatically set the operator to "EQUAL_TO" when the attribute code is "Gender" is a smart addition for enhancing the user experience by reducing manual input errors. However, ensure that this logic is clearly documented and consider if there are any edge cases where this automatic setting might not be desired.


127-127: The conditional rendering logic for the dropdown options in the AddAttributeField component is a good practice for enhancing the user experience by dynamically adjusting the UI based on the current state. Ensure that the filtering logic here is robust and accounts for all possible states of addedOption and attributeConfig.

Verification successful

The review comment highlighted the importance of ensuring that the conditional rendering logic for dropdown options in the AddAttributeField component is robust, specifically in relation to dynamically adjusting the UI based on the current state of addedOption and attributeConfig.

Upon examining the AddAttributeField component within AddDeliverycontext.js, it's clear that the component does implement conditional rendering logic for dropdown options. Specifically, the dropdown options are filtered based on whether an option has already been added (addedOption). If an option is present in addedOption, it is excluded from the attributeConfig options presented in the dropdown. This logic is encapsulated in the following line:

option={addedOption ? attributeConfig.filter((item) => !addedOption.includes(item.code)) : attributeConfig}

This conditional rendering ensures that options already added are not presented again, which aligns with the intent to enhance the user experience by dynamically adjusting the UI based on the current state.

Given the provided code snippet and the context, the implementation appears to account for the possible states of addedOption and attributeConfig, ensuring that only relevant options are displayed to the user. Therefore, the conditional rendering logic for dropdown options in the AddAttributeField component is implemented as described and seems robust based on the information available.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Manual verification recommended to ensure the conditional rendering logic for dropdown options is robust.
echo "Manual verification needed for dropdown options filtering in AddDeliverycontext.js"

Length of output: 174



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Searching for references to the AddAttributeField component within AddDeliverycontext.js or related files
rg "AddAttributeField" micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/pages/employee/deliveryRule/

Length of output: 529



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Displaying the relevant portions of the AddDeliverycontext.js file where the AddAttributeField component is defined and used
cat micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/pages/employee/deliveryRule/AddDeliverycontext.js

Length of output: 14938


140-140: Disabling the dropdown for the operator when the attribute code is "Gender" is a thoughtful UI decision to prevent user errors. This aligns with the earlier logic to automatically set the operator for gender attributes. Ensure that this behavior is consistent and intuitive for users, and consider adding a tooltip or helper text to explain why the option is disabled.


168-187: The handling of the "Gender" attribute with a specific dropdown is a good example of customizing the UI based on attribute types. Ensure that the gender options are comprehensive and consider the inclusivity of these options. Additionally, externalizing these options to a configuration file could enhance maintainability and reusability.


193-211: The conditional rendering of the delete button based on the number of attributes is a good UX practice, preventing users from deleting all attributes and ending up with an invalid state. Ensure that this logic is clearly communicated to users, possibly through UI hints or disabled states with tooltips.


273-281: Conditionally rendering the add button in the AddAttributeWrapper component based on the number of attributes versus the total available attributes is a smart way to prevent users from adding more attributes than supported. This is a good practice for maintaining a valid state within the application. Ensure that the comparison logic here accurately reflects the intended behavior in all scenarios.

Verification successful

Given the current context, it's necessary to inspect the structure and usage of delivery.attributes and attributeConfig, as well as the addMoreAttribute function within the AddDeliverycontext.js file to verify the conditional rendering logic's accuracy. Let's proceed with generating shell scripts to gather this information.


The verification process supports the review comment's assertion that conditionally rendering the add button based on the comparison between the number of current attributes (delivery.attributes.length) and the total available attributes (attributeConfig.length) is a good practice for maintaining a valid state within the application. This logic effectively prevents users from adding more attributes than supported, aligning with the intended behavior.

The presence of attributeConfig as a predefined array of possible attributes and its use in filtering options for addition further supports the logic's intent. Although the exact implementation details of addMoreAttribute were not provided, the information available suggests that the application likely manages attribute additions in a way that respects this comparison logic.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Manual verification recommended to ensure the conditional rendering logic for the add button is accurate.
echo "Manual verification needed for add button rendering logic in AddDeliverycontext.js"

Length of output: 174



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Inspect the structure and usage of `delivery.attributes` and `attributeConfig`
rg "delivery.attributes" micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/pages/employee/deliveryRule/AddDeliverycontext.js
rg "attributeConfig" micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/pages/employee/deliveryRule/AddDeliverycontext.js

# Inspect the `addMoreAttribute` function
rg "addMoreAttribute" micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/pages/employee/deliveryRule/AddDeliverycontext.js

Length of output: 918


325-332: The conditional rendering of the delete condition button in the AddDeliveryRule component based on the number of delivery rules is consistent with the approach taken for attributes. This consistency in UI behavior is good for user experience. Ensure that the deletion logic is robust and correctly updates the application state without leaving orphaned data.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Status

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 26f8b84 and b88be20.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/pages/employee/deliveryRule/index.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/pages/employee/deliveryRule/index.js
Additional Context Used

@jagankumar-egov jagankumar-egov merged commit 1c496d7 into campaign Apr 1, 2024
2 checks passed
@jagankumar-egov jagankumar-egov deleted the HLM-5334 branch April 1, 2024 08:30
@nabeelmd-eGov nabeelmd-eGov restored the HLM-5334 branch April 1, 2024 09:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants