Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HLM Individual search failed on userid based search fixed #758

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 30, 2024

Conversation

kanishq-egov
Copy link
Contributor

@kanishq-egov kanishq-egov commented May 30, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced search functionality to support querying with multiple usernames and user IDs. This allows for more flexible and comprehensive search results.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 30, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent update enhances the query functionality in the IndividualRepository class by allowing the getQueryForIndividual method to handle multiple values for username and userId parameters using IN clauses. This change supports more flexible and comprehensive search capabilities within the repository.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.../individual/repository/IndividualRepository.java Modified the getQueryForIndividual method to use IN clauses for username and userId parameters, allowing multiple values for these fields.

Sequence Diagram(s) (Beta)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant IndividualRepository
    participant Database

    Client->>IndividualRepository: getQueryForIndividual(searchObject, limit)
    IndividualRepository->>IndividualRepository: Construct query with IN clauses
    IndividualRepository->>Database: Execute query with multiple usernames and userIds
    Database->>IndividualRepository: Return results
    IndividualRepository->>Client: Return results
Loading

Poem

In the code where queries dwell,
New IN clauses cast their spell.
Usernames and IDs, many to find,
Flexibility now, so well-defined.
With streams and maps, the search refines,
Our repository, so redefined.
🎉✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@kavi-egov kavi-egov merged commit e8d6558 into master May 30, 2024
2 of 3 checks passed
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b7a63ee and b5757ca.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • health-services/individual/src/main/java/org/egov/individual/repository/IndividualRepository.java (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
health-services/individual/src/main/java/org/egov/individual/repository/IndividualRepository.java (1)

275-278: The transformation of userId values to strings and collection handling looks correct. However, verify that all calling methods are updated to pass userId as a collection.

Verification successful

The userId field in the IndividualSearch class is defined as a List<Long>, confirming that it is indeed a collection. Therefore, the transformation of userId values to strings and collection handling in the getQueryForIndividual method is correct.

  • IndividualSearch class definition:
    • health-services/libraries/health-services-models/src/main/java/org/egov/common/models/individual/IndividualSearch.java
    • userId field: private List<Long> userId;
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `getQueryForIndividual` pass `userId` as a collection.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances with collections as arguments.
rg --type java $'getQueryForIndividual\('

Length of output: 443



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract the context around the call to `getQueryForIndividual` to verify the type of `userId`.

# Display 5 lines before and after the call to `getQueryForIndividual`
rg --type java -C 5 'getQueryForIndividual\(' health-services/individual/src/main/java/org/egov/individual/repository/IndividualRepository.java

Length of output: 1519



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the definition of `IndividualSearch` and inspect the `userId` field.

# Find the file containing the definition of `IndividualSearch`
rg --type java 'class IndividualSearch'

# Display the definition of the `userId` field in `IndividualSearch`
rg --type java 'userId' $(rg --files-with-matches 'class IndividualSearch')

Length of output: 2204

@@ -267,13 +267,15 @@ private String getQueryForIndividual(IndividualSearch searchObject, Integer limi
}

if (searchObject.getUsername() != null) {
query = query + "AND username=:username ";
query = query + "AND username in (:username) ";
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ensure proper indexing on the username column to optimize performance with the IN clause.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants