Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cherry-pick #17759 to 7.x: Add fields validation for histogram subfields #17785

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 21, 2020

Conversation

jsoriano
Copy link
Member

@jsoriano jsoriano commented Apr 17, 2020

Cherry-pick of PR #17759 to 7.x branch. Original message:

What does this PR do?

Add validation to histogram subfields in a way that they don't need to
be added to the mappings, but they can still be checked. This is helpful
to avoid having to add exceptions to all the modules based on Prometheus
when Elasticsearch types are used.

Why is it important?

To avoid needing to add exceptions or additional mappings to the Prometheus
module or to modules based on it (as in #17736).

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have made corresponding change to the default configuration files
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have added an entry in CHANGELOG.next.asciidoc or CHANGELOG-developer.next.asciidoc.

Related issues

Add validation to histogram subfields in a way that they don't need to
be added to the mappings, but they can still be checked. This is helpful
to avoid having to add exceptions to all the modules based on Prometheus
when Elasticsearch types are used.

(cherry picked from commit 5983411)
@jsoriano jsoriano merged commit dd3fa32 into elastic:7.x Apr 21, 2020
@jsoriano jsoriano deleted the backport_17759_7.x branch April 21, 2020 07:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants