Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Scale connection pool automatically #1015

Merged

Conversation

danielmitterdorfer
Copy link
Member

With this commit we scale Rally's connection pool automatically between
(at least) 256 and (at most) the number of simulated clients.
Additionally, we allow users to override this value with the client
option max_connections. Previously this value has been initialized to
a constant but very high value.

With this commit we scale Rally's connection pool automatically between
(at least) 256 and (at most) the number of simulated clients.
Additionally, we allow users to override this value with the client
option `max_connections`. Previously this value has been initialized to
a constant but very high value.
@danielmitterdorfer danielmitterdorfer added enhancement Improves the status quo :Load Driver Changes that affect the core of the load driver such as scheduling, the measurement approach etc. labels Jun 12, 2020
@danielmitterdorfer danielmitterdorfer added this to the 2.0.1 milestone Jun 12, 2020
@danielmitterdorfer danielmitterdorfer self-assigned this Jun 12, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@dliappis dliappis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM thanks

@danielmitterdorfer danielmitterdorfer merged commit 42df7d5 into elastic:master Jun 12, 2020
@danielmitterdorfer danielmitterdorfer deleted the proper-pool-size branch June 12, 2020 08:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Improves the status quo :Load Driver Changes that affect the core of the load driver such as scheduling, the measurement approach etc.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants