-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add tutorial about debugging #146
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #146 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 88.25% 88.30% +0.05%
==========================================
Files 36 36
Lines 1899 1899
==========================================
+ Hits 1676 1677 +1
+ Misses 223 222 -1 see 1 file with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
guides/advanced/debugging.md
Outdated
to learn more about what's in the WebRTC Internals, or simply explore the tool and see what you find useful. | ||
|
||
> #### Other browsers {: .info} | ||
> Chromium's WebRTC Internals is arguably the best tool of this kind. Firefox provides `about:webrtc` page, but it's not nearly as featureful as `chrome::/webrtc-internals`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
> Chromium's WebRTC Internals is arguably the best tool of this kind. Firefox provides `about:webrtc` page, but it's not nearly as featureful as `chrome::/webrtc-internals`. | |
> Chromium's WebRTC Internals is arguably the best tool of this kind. Firefox provides `about:webrtc` page, but it's not nearly as featureful as `chrome://webrtc-internals`. |
dee6e6c
to
884518b
Compare
Close #142