Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The Ember Times No. 92 - April 5th 2019 #46

Merged
merged 44 commits into from
Apr 5, 2019
Merged

Conversation

amyrlam
Copy link
Member

@amyrlam amyrlam commented Apr 1, 2019

📝 Ideas, feel free to add to list or claim!

🤔 Questions?

✅ Todos:

Sources

Screenshot 2019-04-05 at 16 48 23

@lisaychuang
Copy link
Contributor

lisaychuang commented Apr 1, 2019

Hi everyone, I've written up a brief intro for my post. Just created a PR for it ⬇️

lisaychuang and others added 7 commits April 1, 2019 13:34
Changed from ==== to ---
Remove typos from Merge conflict
Remove extra ---
Add blank space per suggestion

Co-Authored-By: lisaychuang <[email protected]>
Update to TitleCase

Co-Authored-By: lisaychuang <[email protected]>
Add a section to Blog/embertimes 92
@amyrlam amyrlam added the embertimes PR for an Ember Times issue label Apr 2, 2019
@amyrlam
Copy link
Member Author

amyrlam commented Apr 4, 2019

  • need to correct date, been trying to get this branch to show up on netlify, no success yet!

Copy link
Contributor

@jayjayjpg jayjayjpg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This reads great - thanks to everyone who contributed this week, so much ✨

@amyrlam amyrlam changed the title [WIP] The Ember Times No. 92 - April 5th 2019 The Ember Times No. 92 - April 5th 2019 Apr 5, 2019
@amyrlam amyrlam merged commit 530cb63 into master Apr 5, 2019
@amyrlam amyrlam deleted the blog/embertimes-92 branch April 5, 2019 21:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
embertimes PR for an Ember Times issue
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants