-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Disable costly eventManager support when unused. #14756
Disable costly eventManager support when unused. #14756
Conversation
For every event that we observe (which is basically all bubbling events in the DOM) we would iterate the entire `parentView` structure of the target elements view looking for an `eventManager` (and then we would dispatch the event to the `eventManager` instead of the view itself). This support has existed for a *very* long time, and is generally unused in most applications. Unfortunately, the iteration upwards through the view heirarchy is much more costly than we would like. This is currently being done for events like `mouseenter` and `mousemove` and that very very very few applications (if any) actually take advantage of this support. This changes the `EventDispatcher` to (by default) disable support for `eventManager`'s (and avoids the costly `parentView` iteration) until we actually instantiate a component that has an `eventManager` property. In the future, we should deprecate specifying an `eventManager`, but this makes the feature much more "pay as you go".
@GavinJoyce - Would you like to work on the deprecation RFC (we can use the same conditional to add the deprecation)? |
Nice one!
Sure, I'll work on the RFC and deprecation |
@rwjblue I'd have thought this would be a huge performance win, do you have any idea how big? |
@jonnii - I agree it should have a nice perf win, but haven't really done any testing. Most of the benchmarks I've been running locally are specifically testing initial render or rerender performance, and those types of tests generally wouldn't benefit from this (AFAICT). I think the types of things that would benefit would be rerenders where many events are firing. I'd definitely be interested in some numbers if you happened to have a perf testing harness setup in this way... |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks fine to me.
For every event that we observe (which is basically all bubbling events in the DOM) we would iterate the entire
parentView
structure of the target elements view looking for aneventManager
(and then we would dispatch the event to theeventManager
instead of the view itself).This support has existed for a very long time, and is generally unused in most applications. Unfortunately, the iteration upwards through the view heirarchy is much more costly than we would like. This is currently being done for events like
mouseenter
andmousemove
and that very very very few applications (if any) actually take advantage of this support.This changes the
EventDispatcher
to (by default) disable support foreventManager
's (and avoids the costlyparentView
iteration) until we actually instantiate a component that has aneventManager
property.In the future, we should deprecate specifying an
eventManager
, but this makes the feature much more "pay as you go".Related to #14754