Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove for and since deprecations from deprecate method #19627

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Remove for and since deprecations from deprecate method #19627

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

nlfurniss
Copy link
Contributor

Part of #19617

Deprecate without for ember-source-deprecation-without-for Deprecation Invocation Site
Deprecate without since ember-source-deprecation-without-since Deprecation Invocation Site

TEST_SUITE=all yarn test passes locally

});
}
assert(missingOptionsForDeprecation(options!.id), Boolean(options!.for));
assert(missingOptionsSinceDeprecation(options!.id), Boolean(options!.since));
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems inconsistent that these asserts bother to include the deprecation id and the earlier asserts do not.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah I wasn't sure why, but seems like good so I left it

@mixonic mixonic mentioned this pull request Jul 18, 2021
58 tasks
@rwjblue rwjblue closed this Jul 18, 2021
@rwjblue rwjblue deleted the branch emberjs:v4-cleanup July 18, 2021 02:05
@mixonic
Copy link
Member

mixonic commented Jul 18, 2021

@nlfurniss this PR was auto-closed when v4-cleanup was merged to master. Can you re-open for us to review/merge against master? This is excellent work and I don't want to lose it.

@mixonic
Copy link
Member

mixonic commented Jul 18, 2021

Replaced by #19643

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants