-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement RFC#1006, Deprecate (action)
and {{action}}
#20653
Conversation
(action)
and {{action}}
(action)
and {{action}}
cb5644b
to
0518131
Compare
Should the available/whatever flags be 5.9 or 5.10? |
At a first pass the implementation seems good. I guess we should make sure the deprecation URL is live before we merge this. |
I agree with @ef4, but syncing that is why we have "Ready for Release". I think this either needs a feature flag or the RFC needs to be in "Ready for Release" to merge. |
0b5c2f7
to
db0f0d8
Compare
db0f0d8
to
567dc6a
Compare
packages/@ember/-internals/glimmer/tests/integration/components/input-angle-test.js
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
expectDeprecation( | ||
/Usage of the `\(action\)` helper is deprecated./, | ||
DEPRECATIONS.DEPRECATE_TEMPLATE_ACTION.isEnabled | ||
); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this test be converted to using functions?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fair enough, updated!
packages/@ember/-internals/glimmer/tests/integration/components/input-curly-test.js
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Thank you, set automerge! |
RFC: emberjs/rfcs#1006
Pending: emberjs/rfcs#1006I was was going through implementing the removal of all this code in a later PR (for v6), I (re?)learned that by deprecating
(action)
and{{action}}
we shadow-deprecate theactions: {}
hash in classic.Should that have its own deprecation RFC?