Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
EmberData | deprecate Store extends EmberObject #1026
EmberData | deprecate Store extends EmberObject #1026
Changes from 1 commit
8695f5d
3763631
06a516f
f265eef
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We've had a bit of a conversation on this in RFC review, I don't know if I'm overthining things but have we considered any of the negative aspects of introducing a new way to turn off deprecations like this?
i.e. we recently rolled out the deprecation for the implicit root model which requires you to update an optional feature to turn off the deprecation.
I feel like having two places to explain and document might get a bit strange, but I don't know if I'm over-indexing on how bad that would be 🤔
I'm also concerned that that introducing things like this into the ember-cli-build file doesn't feel very modern in terms of the modern tooling we're working on (Embroider, Vite) and I think the more natural way to achieve the desired outcome would be to either change the import location (as mentioned in the alternatives) or changing the thing that is imported e.g.
import { NewStore as Store } from '@ember-data/store'
On that point what does
not chosen as this is too minimal a change
mean? 😂There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is in fact not a new way! This has been the way to resolve deprecations and remove associated code in EmberData for a few years now. This docs for this are here: https://api.emberjs.com/ember-data/release/modules/@ember-data%2Fdeprecations
EmberData/WarpDrive is not ember-source and its pretty hard for us to piggy back on ember-source infra, especially without introducing accidental coupling we don't want.
Just the opposite! Our config story was already driven by macros, and in preparation for stand-alone (no-embroider) vite and v2-addons we've extracted that into a
setConfig
function. In ember apps, the most natural place to invoke this function is still from within ember-cli-build, especially as at the moment embroider/macros is still coupled to the app instance as the key for configs.store is the most used import for typescript apps and addons, and changing it would be difficult. Especially because it would mean changing it for our own addon which also imports and extends it (
ember-data
) and sets it as an app re-export. If it even were possible, it would be far more confusing for end users to navigate.In addition to this, it would require a lot of code duplications as javascript does not allow changing a class into a subclass, and introduce the potential for excess churn as we do have motivations for changing the import in the future, a change that if/when it occurs will have to be carefully coordinated and rolled out over an extensive period of time for the same reasons listed above.