Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Advance RFC #1027 "EmberData | SchemaService" to Stage Ready for Release #1030

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

emberjs-rfcs-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@emberjs-rfcs-bot emberjs-rfcs-bot commented Jun 7, 2024

Advance #1027 to the Ready For Release Stage

Rendered

Summary

This pull request is advancing the RFC to the Ready For Release Stage.

An FCP is required before merging this PR to advance.

Upon merging this PR, automation will open a draft PR for this RFC to move to the Released Stage.

Ready for Release Stage Description

This stage is complete when the implementation is complete according to plan outlined in the RFC, and is in harmony with any changes in Ember that have occurred since the RFC was first written. This includes any necessary learning materials. At this stage, features or deprecations may be available for use behind a feature flag, or with an optional package, etc.

For codebase changes, there are no open questions that are anticipated to require breaking changes; the Ember team is ready to commit to the stability of any interfaces exposed by the current implementation of the feature.

This stage should include a list of criteria for determining when the proposal can be considered Recommended after being Released.

An FCP is required to move into this stage.

Each Ember core team will be requested as a reviewer on the PR to move into this stage. A representative of each team adds a review. If a team does not respond to the request, and after the conclusion of the FCP, it is assumed that the release may proceed.

Checklist to move to Ready for Release

  • Implementation is complete according to plan outlined in the RFC, with any adjustments noted in the RFC
  • Any necessary learning materials have been updated
  • The Ember team is ready to commit to the stability of any interfaces exposed by the current implementation of the feature. This is the go/no go decision for any feature flags, but the flags should only be turned on when moving to Released.
  • The feature may not yet have support by the entire ecosystem (e.g. IDEs, addons, Ember Inspector, Engines, Lint Rules, Blueprints, etc), but it does not unintentionally break any existing functionality in those areas.
  • The Interactive Tutorial is not broken by this feature.
  • Criteria for moving to the Recommended Stage has been filled out
  • This PR has been converted from a draft to a regular PR and the Final Comment Period label has been added to start the FCP
  • Each team has been added as a reviewer to the PR at the start of the FCP. Reviews are not required by the end of the FCP. This is a notification step.
    • Framework @emberjs/framework
    • Data @emberjs/ember-data-core
    • CLI @emberjs/cli
    • Learning @emberjs/learning-core
    • Typescript @emberjs/typescript-core
    • Steering @emberjs/steering

Criteria for moving to Recommended (required)

A set of criteria for moving this RFC to the Recommended Stage, following release:

Track Implementation

<-- Use this section to track implementation of the RFC -->

@emberjs-rfcs-bot emberjs-rfcs-bot added RFC Advancement S-Ready for Release PR to move to the Ready for Release Stage labels Jun 7, 2024
@ef4
Copy link
Contributor

ef4 commented Aug 9, 2024

@runspired this one also could use filling out.

@ef4
Copy link
Contributor

ef4 commented Sep 27, 2024

Merged, will go out in 5.4.

@ef4
Copy link
Contributor

ef4 commented Oct 18, 2024

This should probably advance since it sounds "ready for release" but we should double-check the criteria.

@kategengler
Copy link
Member

@runspired What is the status of this?

@runspired
Copy link
Contributor

we should update the text before advancing to reflect a few field schemas that were added after the original RFC was merged.

There may also be some updates to the mechanics of what to do when a schema is missing that we'll want to fill in here.

There's a category of schema fields that is not yet supported around mutable derivations, primarily for shortening long paths. There is an open question as to whether some of this can be solved by enabling arbitrary schema fields to work: emberjs/data#9534

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
RFC Advancement S-Ready for Release PR to move to the Ready for Release Stage
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants