Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make raise_for_status chainable #2776

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Aug 1, 2023

Conversation

trim21
Copy link
Contributor

@trim21 trim21 commented Jul 15, 2023

Summary

make it possible to write code like r = httpx.get('...').raise_for_status().json()

Refs #2775

Checklist

  • I understand that this PR may be closed in case there was no previous discussion. (This doesn't apply to typos!)
  • I've added a test for each change that was introduced, and I tried as much as possible to make a single atomic change.
  • I've updated the documentation accordingly.

@trim21 trim21 marked this pull request as ready for review July 15, 2023 08:37
@tomchristie tomchristie requested a review from a team July 31, 2023 11:48
@tomchristie tomchristie changed the title [WIP]: make raise_for_status chainable Make raise_for_status chainable Jul 31, 2023
Copy link
Member

@abersheeran abersheeran left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. It's a small change, but the experience will be much better.

@tomchristie
Copy link
Member

Okay great, so...

  • CHANGELOG.
  • Do we want to mention this usage style in the docstring? In the docs?

@zanieb
Copy link
Contributor

zanieb commented Jul 31, 2023

I think this usage should be mentioned in the docstring and prose documentation.

@michaeloliverx
Copy link
Member

Really nice DX improvement here, I see myself using this a lot!

@trim21
Copy link
Contributor Author

trim21 commented Jul 31, 2023

document updated
changelog added

Copy link
Member

@tomchristie tomchristie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. Some minor suggestions...

(Other could also be considered)

docs/quickstart.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/quickstart.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
trim21 and others added 3 commits August 1, 2023 17:16
Co-authored-by: Tom Christie <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Tom Christie <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Tom Christie <[email protected]>
@tomchristie tomchristie merged commit 9415af6 into encode:master Aug 1, 2023
5 checks passed
@trim21 trim21 deleted the raise_for_status-chain branch August 1, 2023 09:59
@trim21
Copy link
Contributor Author

trim21 commented Aug 1, 2023

is there any ETA on next release?

@tomchristie
Copy link
Member

If you're up for helping drive a release pull request, then we could fix up a minor point release whenever really.

@karpetrosyan
Copy link
Member

If you're up for helping drive a release pull request, then we could fix up a minor point release whenever really.

Can we include encode/httpcore#745 in the next httpx release?

First, we should release httpcore with that pull request and then release httpx

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants