Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
protobuf: recursively validate unknown fields. (#8094)
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
This PR unifies the recursive traversal of deprecated fields with that of unknown fields. It doesn't
deal with moving to a validator visitor model for deprecation; this would be a nice cleanup that we
track at #8092.

Risk level: Low
Testing: New nested unknown field test added.

Fixes #7980

Signed-off-by: Harvey Tuch <[email protected]>
  • Loading branch information
htuch authored Sep 2, 2019
1 parent 678bf8c commit dad0f2e
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 4 changed files with 64 additions and 43 deletions.
41 changes: 22 additions & 19 deletions source/common/protobuf/utility.cc
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -88,21 +88,6 @@ ProtoValidationException::ProtoValidationException(const std::string& validation
ENVOY_LOG_MISC(debug, "Proto validation error; throwing {}", what());
}

void MessageUtil::checkUnknownFields(const Protobuf::Message& message,
ProtobufMessage::ValidationVisitor& validation_visitor) {
const auto& unknown_fields = message.GetReflection()->GetUnknownFields(message);
// If there are no unknown fields, we're done here.
if (unknown_fields.empty()) {
return;
}
std::string error_msg;
for (int n = 0; n < unknown_fields.field_count(); ++n) {
error_msg += absl::StrCat(n > 0 ? ", " : "", unknown_fields.field(n).number());
}
validation_visitor.onUnknownField("type " + message.GetTypeName() + " with unknown field set {" +
error_msg + "}");
}

void MessageUtil::loadFromJson(const std::string& json, Protobuf::Message& message,
ProtobufMessage::ValidationVisitor& validation_visitor) {
Protobuf::util::JsonParseOptions options;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -159,7 +144,7 @@ void MessageUtil::loadFromFile(const std::string& path, Protobuf::Message& messa
if (absl::EndsWith(path, FileExtensions::get().ProtoBinary)) {
// Attempt to parse the binary format.
if (message.ParseFromString(contents)) {
MessageUtil::checkUnknownFields(message, validation_visitor);
MessageUtil::checkForUnexpectedFields(message, validation_visitor);
return;
}
throw EnvoyException("Unable to parse file \"" + path + "\" as a binary protobuf (type " +
Expand All @@ -180,7 +165,23 @@ void MessageUtil::loadFromFile(const std::string& path, Protobuf::Message& messa
}
}

void MessageUtil::checkForDeprecation(const Protobuf::Message& message, Runtime::Loader* runtime) {
void MessageUtil::checkForUnexpectedFields(const Protobuf::Message& message,
ProtobufMessage::ValidationVisitor& validation_visitor,
Runtime::Loader* runtime) {
// Reject unknown fields.
const auto& unknown_fields = message.GetReflection()->GetUnknownFields(message);
if (!unknown_fields.empty()) {
std::string error_msg;
for (int n = 0; n < unknown_fields.field_count(); ++n) {
error_msg += absl::StrCat(n > 0 ? ", " : "", unknown_fields.field(n).number());
}
// We use the validation visitor but have hard coded behavior below for deprecated fields.
// TODO(htuch): Unify the deprecated and unknown visitor handling behind the validation
// visitor pattern. https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/issues/8092.
validation_visitor.onUnknownField("type " + message.GetTypeName() +
" with unknown field set {" + error_msg + "}");
}

const Protobuf::Descriptor* descriptor = message.GetDescriptor();
const Protobuf::Reflection* reflection = message.GetReflection();
for (int i = 0; i < descriptor->field_count(); ++i) {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -231,10 +232,12 @@ void MessageUtil::checkForDeprecation(const Protobuf::Message& message, Runtime:
if (field->is_repeated()) {
const int size = reflection->FieldSize(message, field);
for (int j = 0; j < size; ++j) {
checkForDeprecation(reflection->GetRepeatedMessage(message, field, j), runtime);
checkForUnexpectedFields(reflection->GetRepeatedMessage(message, field, j),
validation_visitor, runtime);
}
} else {
checkForDeprecation(reflection->GetMessage(message, field), runtime);
checkForUnexpectedFields(reflection->GetMessage(message, field), validation_visitor,
runtime);
}
}
}
Expand Down
13 changes: 5 additions & 8 deletions source/common/protobuf/utility.h
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -206,9 +206,6 @@ class MessageUtil {
return HashUtil::xxHash64(text);
}

static void checkUnknownFields(const Protobuf::Message& message,
ProtobufMessage::ValidationVisitor& validation_visitor);

static void loadFromJson(const std::string& json, Protobuf::Message& message,
ProtobufMessage::ValidationVisitor& validation_visitor);
static void loadFromJson(const std::string& json, ProtobufWkt::Struct& message);
Expand All @@ -225,8 +222,9 @@ class MessageUtil {
* in disallowed_features in runtime_features.h
*/
static void
checkForDeprecation(const Protobuf::Message& message,
Runtime::Loader* loader = Runtime::LoaderSingleton::getExisting());
checkForUnexpectedFields(const Protobuf::Message& message,
ProtobufMessage::ValidationVisitor& validation_visitor,
Runtime::Loader* loader = Runtime::LoaderSingleton::getExisting());

/**
* Validate protoc-gen-validate constraints on a given protobuf.
Expand All @@ -238,9 +236,8 @@ class MessageUtil {
template <class MessageType>
static void validate(const MessageType& message,
ProtobufMessage::ValidationVisitor& validation_visitor) {
// Log warnings or throw errors if deprecated fields are in use.
checkForDeprecation(message);
checkUnknownFields(message, validation_visitor);
// Log warnings or throw errors if deprecated fields or unknown fields are in use.
checkForUnexpectedFields(message, validation_visitor);

std::string err;
if (!Validate(message, &err)) {
Expand Down
48 changes: 33 additions & 15 deletions test/common/protobuf/utility_test.cc
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,8 +1,10 @@
#include <unordered_set>

#include "envoy/api/v2/cds.pb.validate.h"
#include "envoy/config/bootstrap/v2/bootstrap.pb.h"
#include "envoy/config/bootstrap/v2/bootstrap.pb.validate.h"

#include "common/protobuf/message_validator_impl.h"
#include "common/protobuf/protobuf.h"
#include "common/protobuf/utility.h"
#include "common/runtime/runtime_impl.h"
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -145,6 +147,19 @@ TEST_F(ProtobufUtilityTest, DowncastAndValidateUnknownFields) {
"unknown field set {1}) has unknown fields");
}

// Validated exception thrown when downcastAndValidate observes a nested unknown field.
TEST_F(ProtobufUtilityTest, DowncastAndValidateUnknownFieldsNested) {
envoy::config::bootstrap::v2::Bootstrap bootstrap;
auto* cluster = bootstrap.mutable_static_resources()->add_clusters();
cluster->GetReflection()->MutableUnknownFields(cluster)->AddVarint(1, 0);
EXPECT_THROW_WITH_MESSAGE(TestUtility::validate(*cluster), EnvoyException,
"Protobuf message (type envoy.api.v2.Cluster with "
"unknown field set {1}) has unknown fields");
EXPECT_THROW_WITH_MESSAGE(TestUtility::validate(bootstrap), EnvoyException,
"Protobuf message (type envoy.api.v2.Cluster with "
"unknown field set {1}) has unknown fields");
}

TEST_F(ProtobufUtilityTest, LoadBinaryProtoFromFile) {
envoy::config::bootstrap::v2::Bootstrap bootstrap;
bootstrap.mutable_cluster_manager()
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -494,20 +509,24 @@ class DeprecatedFieldsTest : public testing::Test {
NiceMock<ProtobufMessage::MockValidationVisitor> validation_visitor_;
};

void checkForDeprecation(const Protobuf::Message& message) {
MessageUtil::checkForUnexpectedFields(message, ProtobufMessage::getStrictValidationVisitor());
}

TEST_F(DeprecatedFieldsTest, NoCrashIfRuntimeMissing) {
loader_.reset();

envoy::test::deprecation_test::Base base;
base.set_not_deprecated("foo");
// Fatal checks for a non-deprecated field should cause no problem.
MessageUtil::checkForDeprecation(base);
checkForDeprecation(base);
}

TEST_F(DeprecatedFieldsTest, NoErrorWhenDeprecatedFieldsUnused) {
envoy::test::deprecation_test::Base base;
base.set_not_deprecated("foo");
// Fatal checks for a non-deprecated field should cause no problem.
MessageUtil::checkForDeprecation(base);
checkForDeprecation(base);
EXPECT_EQ(0, runtime_deprecated_feature_use_.value());
}

Expand All @@ -517,7 +536,7 @@ TEST_F(DeprecatedFieldsTest, DEPRECATED_FEATURE_TEST(IndividualFieldDeprecated))
// Non-fatal checks for a deprecated field should log rather than throw an exception.
EXPECT_LOG_CONTAINS("warning",
"Using deprecated option 'envoy.test.deprecation_test.Base.is_deprecated'",
MessageUtil::checkForDeprecation(base));
checkForDeprecation(base));
EXPECT_EQ(1, runtime_deprecated_feature_use_.value());
}

Expand All @@ -526,7 +545,7 @@ TEST_F(DeprecatedFieldsTest, DEPRECATED_FEATURE_TEST(IndividualFieldDisallowed))
envoy::test::deprecation_test::Base base;
base.set_is_deprecated_fatal("foo");
EXPECT_THROW_WITH_REGEX(
MessageUtil::checkForDeprecation(base), ProtoValidationException,
checkForDeprecation(base), ProtoValidationException,
"Using deprecated option 'envoy.test.deprecation_test.Base.is_deprecated_fatal'");
}

Expand All @@ -537,7 +556,7 @@ TEST_F(DeprecatedFieldsTest,

// Make sure this is set up right.
EXPECT_THROW_WITH_REGEX(
MessageUtil::checkForDeprecation(base), ProtoValidationException,
checkForDeprecation(base), ProtoValidationException,
"Using deprecated option 'envoy.test.deprecation_test.Base.is_deprecated_fatal'");
// The config will be rejected, so the feature will not be used.
EXPECT_EQ(0, runtime_deprecated_feature_use_.value());
Expand All @@ -549,7 +568,7 @@ TEST_F(DeprecatedFieldsTest,
// Now the same deprecation check should only trigger a warning.
EXPECT_LOG_CONTAINS(
"warning", "Using deprecated option 'envoy.test.deprecation_test.Base.is_deprecated_fatal'",
MessageUtil::checkForDeprecation(base));
checkForDeprecation(base));
EXPECT_EQ(1, runtime_deprecated_feature_use_.value());
}

Expand All @@ -559,15 +578,15 @@ TEST_F(DeprecatedFieldsTest, DEPRECATED_FEATURE_TEST(DisallowViaRuntime)) {

EXPECT_LOG_CONTAINS("warning",
"Using deprecated option 'envoy.test.deprecation_test.Base.is_deprecated'",
MessageUtil::checkForDeprecation(base));
checkForDeprecation(base));
EXPECT_EQ(1, runtime_deprecated_feature_use_.value());

// Now create a new snapshot with this feature disallowed.
Runtime::LoaderSingleton::getExisting()->mergeValues(
{{"envoy.deprecated_features.deprecated.proto:is_deprecated", " false"}});

EXPECT_THROW_WITH_REGEX(
MessageUtil::checkForDeprecation(base), ProtoValidationException,
checkForDeprecation(base), ProtoValidationException,
"Using deprecated option 'envoy.test.deprecation_test.Base.is_deprecated'");
EXPECT_EQ(1, runtime_deprecated_feature_use_.value());
}
Expand All @@ -582,7 +601,7 @@ TEST_F(DeprecatedFieldsTest, DEPRECATED_FEATURE_TEST(MixOfFatalAndWarnings)) {
EXPECT_LOG_CONTAINS(
"warning", "Using deprecated option 'envoy.test.deprecation_test.Base.is_deprecated'", {
EXPECT_THROW_WITH_REGEX(
MessageUtil::checkForDeprecation(base), ProtoValidationException,
checkForDeprecation(base), ProtoValidationException,
"Using deprecated option 'envoy.test.deprecation_test.Base.is_deprecated_fatal'");
});
}
Expand All @@ -593,23 +612,22 @@ TEST_F(DeprecatedFieldsTest, DEPRECATED_FEATURE_TEST(MessageDeprecated)) {
base.mutable_deprecated_message();
EXPECT_LOG_CONTAINS(
"warning", "Using deprecated option 'envoy.test.deprecation_test.Base.deprecated_message'",
MessageUtil::checkForDeprecation(base));
checkForDeprecation(base));
EXPECT_EQ(1, runtime_deprecated_feature_use_.value());
}

TEST_F(DeprecatedFieldsTest, DEPRECATED_FEATURE_TEST(InnerMessageDeprecated)) {
envoy::test::deprecation_test::Base base;
base.mutable_not_deprecated_message()->set_inner_not_deprecated("foo");
// Checks for a non-deprecated field shouldn't trigger warnings
EXPECT_LOG_NOT_CONTAINS("warning", "Using deprecated option",
MessageUtil::checkForDeprecation(base));
EXPECT_LOG_NOT_CONTAINS("warning", "Using deprecated option", checkForDeprecation(base));

base.mutable_not_deprecated_message()->set_inner_deprecated("bar");
// Checks for a deprecated sub-message should result in a warning.
EXPECT_LOG_CONTAINS(
"warning",
"Using deprecated option 'envoy.test.deprecation_test.Base.InnerMessage.inner_deprecated'",
MessageUtil::checkForDeprecation(base));
checkForDeprecation(base));
}

// Check that repeated sub-messages get validated.
Expand All @@ -623,7 +641,7 @@ TEST_F(DeprecatedFieldsTest, DEPRECATED_FEATURE_TEST(SubMessageDeprecated)) {
EXPECT_LOG_CONTAINS("warning",
"Using deprecated option "
"'envoy.test.deprecation_test.Base.InnerMessage.inner_deprecated'",
MessageUtil::checkForDeprecation(base));
checkForDeprecation(base));
}

// Check that deprecated repeated messages trigger
Expand All @@ -635,7 +653,7 @@ TEST_F(DeprecatedFieldsTest, DEPRECATED_FEATURE_TEST(RepeatedMessageDeprecated))
EXPECT_LOG_CONTAINS("warning",
"Using deprecated option "
"'envoy.test.deprecation_test.Base.deprecated_repeated_message'",
MessageUtil::checkForDeprecation(base));
checkForDeprecation(base));
}

class TimestampUtilTest : public testing::Test, public ::testing::WithParamInterface<int64_t> {};
Expand Down
5 changes: 4 additions & 1 deletion test/tools/router_check/router.cc
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
#include <unordered_map>

#include "common/network/utility.h"
#include "common/protobuf/message_validator_impl.h"
#include "common/protobuf/utility.h"
#include "common/stream_info/stream_info_impl.h"

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -74,7 +75,9 @@ RouterCheckTool RouterCheckTool::create(const std::string& router_config_file,
auto factory_context = std::make_unique<NiceMock<Server::Configuration::MockFactoryContext>>();
auto config = std::make_unique<Router::ConfigImpl>(route_config, *factory_context, false);
if (!disableDeprecationCheck) {
MessageUtil::checkForDeprecation(route_config, &factory_context->runtime_loader_);
MessageUtil::checkForUnexpectedFields(route_config,
ProtobufMessage::getStrictValidationVisitor(),
&factory_context->runtime_loader_);
}

return RouterCheckTool(std::move(factory_context), std::move(config), std::move(stats),
Expand Down

0 comments on commit dad0f2e

Please sign in to comment.