-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
buffer: draining any zero byte fragments #9837
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Wilk <[email protected]>
mattklein123
approved these changes
Jan 27, 2020
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
lizan
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 3, 2020
Given that we allow creating zero byte fragments, it'd be good to proactively drain them. For example if someone is doing timing instrumentation and wants to know when Network::Connection data is written to the kernel, it could be useful to have a zero byte sentinel. Risk Level: Low (I don't think anyone is adding zero byte fragments yet) Testing: new unit test Docs Changes: n/a Release Notes: n/a Signed-off-by: Alyssa Wilk <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jianfei Hu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Lizan Zhou <[email protected]>
howardjohn
pushed a commit
to istio/envoy
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 3, 2020
Given that we allow creating zero byte fragments, it'd be good to proactively drain them. For example if someone is doing timing instrumentation and wants to know when Network::Connection data is written to the kernel, it could be useful to have a zero byte sentinel. Risk Level: Low (I don't think anyone is adding zero byte fragments yet) Testing: new unit test Docs Changes: n/a Release Notes: n/a Signed-off-by: Alyssa Wilk <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jianfei Hu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Lizan Zhou <[email protected]>
lizan
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 3, 2020
Given that we allow creating zero byte fragments, it'd be good to proactively drain them. For example if someone is doing timing instrumentation and wants to know when Network::Connection data is written to the kernel, it could be useful to have a zero byte sentinel. Risk Level: Low (I don't think anyone is adding zero byte fragments yet) Testing: new unit test Docs Changes: n/a Release Notes: n/a Signed-off-by: Alyssa Wilk <[email protected]>
PiotrSikora
pushed a commit
to PiotrSikora/envoy
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 3, 2020
…y#109) Given that we allow creating zero byte fragments, it'd be good to proactively drain them. For example if someone is doing timing instrumentation and wants to know when Network::Connection data is written to the kernel, it could be useful to have a zero byte sentinel. Risk Level: Low (I don't think anyone is adding zero byte fragments yet) Testing: new unit test Docs Changes: n/a Release Notes: n/a Signed-off-by: Alyssa Wilk <[email protected]>
istio-testing
pushed a commit
to istio/envoy
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 3, 2020
Given that we allow creating zero byte fragments, it'd be good to proactively drain them. For example if someone is doing timing instrumentation and wants to know when Network::Connection data is written to the kernel, it could be useful to have a zero byte sentinel. Risk Level: Low (I don't think anyone is adding zero byte fragments yet) Testing: new unit test Docs Changes: n/a Release Notes: n/a Signed-off-by: Alyssa Wilk <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Lizan Zhou <[email protected]>
LukeShu
pushed a commit
to datawire/envoy
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 6, 2020
…y#109) (envoyproxy#123) Given that we allow creating zero byte fragments, it'd be good to proactively drain them. For example if someone is doing timing instrumentation and wants to know when Network::Connection data is written to the kernel, it could be useful to have a zero byte sentinel. Risk Level: Low (I don't think anyone is adding zero byte fragments yet) Testing: new unit test Docs Changes: n/a Release Notes: n/a Signed-off-by: Alyssa Wilk <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jianfei Hu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Lizan Zhou <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Given that we allow creating zero byte fragments, it'd be good to proactively drain them. For example if someone is doing timing instrumentation and wants to know when Network::Connection data is written to the kernel, it could be useful to have a zero byte sentinel.
Risk Level: Low (I don't think anyone is adding zero byte fragments yet)
Testing: new unit test
Docs Changes: n/a
Release Notes: n/a