Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Made single node selection more obvious #121

Merged

Conversation

rubenthoms
Copy link
Collaborator

Before, when allowing only a single node to be selected, the selector was still rendered as if several nodes could be selected. This was using unnecessary much space and could be confusing for the user. This PR makes the single node selection more obvious by changing how the selector is rendered.

@rubenthoms rubenthoms assigned jorgenherje and unassigned jorgenherje May 3, 2021
@jorgenherje jorgenherje self-assigned this May 4, 2021
@rubenthoms rubenthoms force-pushed the SmartNodeSelector-single-selection branch from 56a46b7 to ad05ba4 Compare May 4, 2021 11:18
@jorgenherje jorgenherje removed their assignment May 4, 2021
@rubenthoms rubenthoms force-pushed the SmartNodeSelector-single-selection branch from ad05ba4 to ef6c246 Compare May 4, 2021 11:46
@anders-kiaer
Copy link
Collaborator

anders-kiaer commented May 11, 2021

👍 Good suggestion on changing the renderer when single node is to be selected, and I see this probably becomes immediately valuable to e.g. @jorgenherje and the calculator component.

LGTM.

Copy link
Collaborator

@jorgenherje jorgenherje left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tested single node selection with vector calculator application. Works well and no I have no remarks.

Review code: No remarks

@rubenthoms rubenthoms force-pushed the SmartNodeSelector-single-selection branch from ef6c246 to d5fc9e6 Compare May 20, 2021 09:28
@rubenthoms rubenthoms force-pushed the SmartNodeSelector-single-selection branch from d5fc9e6 to e2745bb Compare May 20, 2021 09:31
@rubenthoms rubenthoms marked this pull request as ready for review May 20, 2021 09:49
@rubenthoms rubenthoms merged commit 6467c24 into equinor:master May 20, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants