Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check reaction ensemble tutorial with current HEAD #3211

Closed
KaiSzuttor opened this issue Sep 26, 2019 · 1 comment · Fixed by #3184 or #3256
Closed

Check reaction ensemble tutorial with current HEAD #3211

KaiSzuttor opened this issue Sep 26, 2019 · 1 comment · Fixed by #3184 or #3256

Comments

@KaiSzuttor
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@jonaslandsgesell
Copy link
Member

jonaslandsgesell commented Sep 26, 2019

I suggest to remove this old tutorial.
I would even do it before the release.

@fweik fweik closed this as completed Oct 16, 2019
bors bot added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 17, 2019
3252: Factor out ParticleList r=jngrad a=fweik

Follow up on #3251.

Description of changes:
 - Pulling `ParticleList` out of `particle_data.hpp` to get better
   header disentanglement.


3256: Remove tutorial 10 and unused LaTeX files r=fweik a=jngrad

Closes #3211

Description of changes:
- removed tutorial 10
- removed unused LaTeX preambles

3257: Remove PDB parser feature r=fweik a=jngrad

The consensus offline at the ICP and online in #1441 is to drop support of the PDB parser feature in favor of the dedicated python package MDAnalysis.

Co-authored-by: Florian Weik <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jean-Noël Grad <[email protected]>
bors bot added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 17, 2019
3252: Factor out ParticleList r=jngrad a=fweik

Follow up on #3251.

Description of changes:
 - Pulling `ParticleList` out of `particle_data.hpp` to get better
   header disentanglement.


3256: Remove tutorial 10 and unused LaTeX files r=fweik a=jngrad

Closes #3211

Description of changes:
- removed tutorial 10
- removed unused LaTeX preambles

3257: Remove PDB parser feature r=fweik a=jngrad

The consensus offline at the ICP and online in #1441 is to drop support of the PDB parser feature in favor of the dedicated python package MDAnalysis.

Co-authored-by: Florian Weik <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jean-Noël Grad <[email protected]>
bors bot added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 23, 2019
3184: some modifications to constant-pH tutorial r=KaiSzuttor a=kosovan

Fixes #3211 

TODO (will do):

- [x] First , explain how the reaction works, then discuss the acceptance

- [x]  Define pH, pK, activity and its relation chemical potential and concentration

- [x]  Refer to original literature for the acceptance, refer to review paper for discussion of peculiarities and pitfalls

- [x] Include all physical parameters of the simulated system (box_l, N0, pKa, pH_range) in one block at the beginning of the script

- [x] Set N0 and concentration in SI units,  calculate box_l in sigma

- [x] restrict the range of pH values to pH in [pK-2:pK+2]

- [x] Remove the discussion of standard error of the mean, refer to Janke instead (statistical analysis is not the learning goal of this tutorial)

- [x] Samples of alpha are correlated. Therefore, apply blocking method or some other analysis of correlated samples. 

- [x] Remove the comparison of histograms, or define a learning goal for this part. Currently, the comparison suggests that constant-pH results differ from theory, while the actual reason for this is insufficient sampling. For a sufficiently long simulations, they should not differ. This is very confusing, especially if it is not explained.

Description of changes:
 - 


PR Checklist
------------
 - [ ] Tests?
   - [ ] Interface
   - [ ] Core 
 - [ ] Docs?


Co-authored-by: Peter Košovan <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jonas Landsgesell <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Peter Košovan <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Peter Kosovan <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jean-Noël Grad <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
3 participants