Unit test for CLI flags and add missing flags #16465
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
riendeau
force-pushed
the
validate-help-flags
branch
2 times, most recently
from
46900f6
to
54f87eb
Compare
Signed-off-by: John Riendeau <[email protected]>
riendeau
force-pushed
the
validate-help-flags
branch
from
54f87eb
to
63e614f
Compare
serathius
approved these changes
Aug 23, 2023
This was referenced Jan 5, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
An attempt to address #16034
Adds a unit test to validate that every (non-ignored) flag defined is present in the help text (either in the usage line or the flags line).
Also adds information on several flags that the unit test identified as missing to the usage text.