op-e2e: pending block test + op-geth update

[protolambda]

Description

Tests that the pending block matches the latest block, a change introduced in ethereum-optimism/op-geth#93

Added a temporary go.mod change so it runs CI with that op-geth PR. We should merge the geth PR first, and then update the go.mod to point at the main branch. Matches latest optimism branch op-geth commit now (previous v1.11.6 changes were included before this PR already, and don't really affect the op-node other than e2e testing, this strictly introduces the receipt L1-fee overhead metadata fix and the pending-block change).

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 6fc9a72

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for opstack-docs canceled.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	6fc9a72
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/opstack-docs/deploys/647128b48709400008c8257b

[ajsutton]

I'm not against this as-is but I worry a bit about the race conditions involved with assertions about the pending block when we aren't controlling block building timing.

[protolambda]

• rebased on develop
• updated op-geth reference to latest
• updated e2e tests for receipt metadata fields

Will look into adding the additional geth tests now, but think we can also choose to merge with current tests as-is if there is any urgency, since it covers the pending-block behavior, and we also already did an internal devnet test (see notion doc).

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #5736 (6fc9a72) into develop (a2b038e) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #5736   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    42.27%   42.28%           
========================================
  Files          464      464           
  Lines        30078    30078           
  Branches       876      876           
========================================
+ Hits         12716    12719    +3     
+ Misses       16360    16359    -1     
+ Partials      1002     1000    -2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
bedrock-go-tests	39.71% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
common-ts-tests	26.82% <ø> (ø)
contracts-bedrock-tests	53.51% <ø> (ø)
contracts-tests	98.86% <ø> (ø)
core-utils-tests	60.41% <ø> (ø)
dtl-tests	47.15% <ø> (ø)
fault-detector-tests	29.33% <ø> (ø)
sdk-tests	39.54% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 2 files with indirect coverage changes

[protolambda]

• Added test for pending block result at every stage of Engine API
• Added TODOs for every usage of -1 as pending-block identifier in ethclient. Once we update op-geth with upstream changes we can cleanly import the geth rpc label vars.
• Edit: and fixed lint

[trianglesphere]

lgtm

[mergify]

This PR has been added to the merge queue, and will be merged soon.

[mergify]

This PR is next in line to be merged, and will be merged as soon as checks pass.

[mergify]

This PR is next in line to be merged, and will be merged as soon as checks pass.