Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Does any have the old PoC etherpad notes? #5

Closed
wanderer opened this issue Oct 27, 2015 · 1 comment
Closed

Does any have the old PoC etherpad notes? #5

wanderer opened this issue Oct 27, 2015 · 1 comment

Comments

@wanderer
Copy link
Member

I can't seem to get the old etherpads with the PoC notes. I would like to add them as Pre-EIPs to the repo if we can get them.
@obscuren
Copy link
Contributor

Will add them ASAP. I have a copy locally of most of the PoCs

@AnthonyAkentiev AnthonyAkentiev mentioned this issue Jan 16, 2018
Closed
@bingen bingen mentioned this issue Jul 24, 2018
Closed
@filmakarov filmakarov mentioned this issue Oct 19, 2022
Merged
ThunderDeliverer added a commit to rmrk-team/EIPs that referenced this issue Nov 15, 2022
@ThunderDeliverer
Apply changes based on ECH call ethereum#5
e2bee24 
Applied the changes based on feedback received on the EIP Editing Office
Hour Meeting ethereum#5.

This commit includes changes to the proposal as well as adds an exaple
implementation to assets/ directory.
eth-bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 25, 2022
@ThunderDeliverer @Pandapip1
@steven2308 @SamWilsn
Add EIP-5773: Multi-Resource Token standard (#5773)
a3bcb50 
* Propose Multi-Resource Token standard

RMRK team has developed a next step in NFTs where one NFT can be tied to
multiple resources.

* Address issues reported by EIP repository's CI

* Fix styling discrepancies in section titles

* Address CI's issues in the preabmle

* Add discussion URL

* Fix discussion URL formatting

* Add the EIP number

* Fix getResourceMeta specification

* Apply changes based on PR comments

* Replace "primitive" with a clearer explanation

Co-authored-by: Pandapip1 <[email protected]>

* Apply changes based on ECH call #5

Applied the changes based on feedback received on the EIP Editing Office
Hour Meeting #5.

This commit includes changes to the proposal as well as adds an exaple
implementation to assets/ directory.

* Address the stylistic issues reported by the CI

* Fix a reference to EIP-712

* Minor typo fixes

* Updates `getResourceMetadata` description

Co-authored-by: Sam Wilson <[email protected]>

* Rename MultiResource -> MultiAsset and relicense

The proposal was renamed to Context-Dependent Multi-Asset Tokens to
better illustrate its function.

Another example was added to represent the possible IoT usecase and the
explanation on the naming decision was added to the rationale.

The examples were relicensed to CC0, to conform to the requirements of
EIP repository.

* Fix license identifier & Specification contract title

* Fix indexes of Rationale questions

* Minor polishing of the rationale

* Update references to assets to use an istead of a in Rationale

* Final polishes

Co-authored-by: Pandapip1 <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Steven Pineda <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Sam Wilson <[email protected]>
@offgridgecko offgridgecko mentioned this issue Dec 12, 2022
Merged
eth-bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 3, 2023
@aschlosberg
Add EIP-6464: Multi-operator, per-token ERC721 approval (#6464)
607ec5d 
* EIP Motivation and Specification for "Multi-operator, per-token ERC721 approval."

* Add remaining authors' names

* Interface overhaul with explanation in EIP markdown.

* Add `Abstract` and `@dev` note about interplay with `setApprovalForAll()`.

* Partial response to cxkoda review

* Full response to cxkoda review

* Explicitly include OZ `IERC{165,721}.sol` instead of using a submodule

* Minor typo and wording changes to draft.

* Prune authors to active participants as they can always be re-added later

* Revert `.gitignore` so as to not change it in the EIP draft (#7)

* Set presumptive EIP number and fix linter complaints (#5)

* Rename files and directories to include EIP number

* Address linter (`EIP Walidator`) issues

* Add presumed EIP number based on PR: 6464

* Revert `.gitignore` to get through initial draft acceptance

* Do the last commit properly ;)

* Add ERC category

* Fix linter issues (#8)

* Update EIP- references to ERC-

* Remove OpenZeppelin interfaces and replace with original EIP versions; change 6464 license to CC0

* Add `solidity` language tag to code block
fulldecent pushed a commit to fulldecent/EIPs that referenced this issue Mar 13, 2023
@aschlosberg @fulldecent
Add EIP-6464: Multi-operator, per-token ERC721 approval (ethereum#6464)
1a903f1 
* EIP Motivation and Specification for "Multi-operator, per-token ERC721 approval."

* Add remaining authors' names

* Interface overhaul with explanation in EIP markdown.

* Add `Abstract` and `@dev` note about interplay with `setApprovalForAll()`.

* Partial response to cxkoda review

* Full response to cxkoda review

* Explicitly include OZ `IERC{165,721}.sol` instead of using a submodule

* Minor typo and wording changes to draft.

* Prune authors to active participants as they can always be re-added later

* Revert `.gitignore` so as to not change it in the EIP draft (ethereum#7)

* Set presumptive EIP number and fix linter complaints (ethereum#5)

* Rename files and directories to include EIP number

* Address linter (`EIP Walidator`) issues

* Add presumed EIP number based on PR: 6464

* Revert `.gitignore` to get through initial draft acceptance

* Do the last commit properly ;)

* Add ERC category

* Fix linter issues (ethereum#8)

* Update EIP- references to ERC-

* Remove OpenZeppelin interfaces and replace with original EIP versions; change 6464 license to CC0

* Add `solidity` language tag to code block
axelcabee pushed a commit to axelcabee/EIPs that referenced this issue May 6, 2023
@aschlosberg @axelcabee
Add EIP-6464: Multi-operator, per-token ERC721 approval (ethereum#6464)
1025f9b 
* EIP Motivation and Specification for "Multi-operator, per-token ERC721 approval."

* Add remaining authors' names

* Interface overhaul with explanation in EIP markdown.

* Add `Abstract` and `@dev` note about interplay with `setApprovalForAll()`.

* Partial response to cxkoda review

* Full response to cxkoda review

* Explicitly include OZ `IERC{165,721}.sol` instead of using a submodule

* Minor typo and wording changes to draft.

* Prune authors to active participants as they can always be re-added later

* Revert `.gitignore` so as to not change it in the EIP draft (ethereum#7)

* Set presumptive EIP number and fix linter complaints (ethereum#5)

* Rename files and directories to include EIP number

* Address linter (`EIP Walidator`) issues

* Add presumed EIP number based on PR: 6464

* Revert `.gitignore` to get through initial draft acceptance

* Do the last commit properly ;)

* Add ERC category

* Fix linter issues (ethereum#8)

* Update EIP- references to ERC-

* Remove OpenZeppelin interfaces and replace with original EIP versions; change 6464 license to CC0

* Add `solidity` language tag to code block
forshtat referenced this issue in forshtat/EIPs Jun 28, 2023
@forshtat
Merge pull request #5 from eth-infinitism/AA-166-changes-erc4337-3
02d9cc7 
AA-166: Change №3 - allow associated storage when using staked factory
diyahir pushed a commit to DeFi-Circuit-Breaker/EIPs that referenced this issue Sep 28, 2023
@Keinberger
Merge pull request ethereum#5 from ikigai-labs-xyz/feature/override-c…
816f950 
…ircuit-breaker

add override circuit breaker
RaphaelHardFork pushed a commit to RaphaelHardFork/EIPs that referenced this issue Jan 30, 2024
@steven2308 @RaphaelHardFork
Moves 7409 to final. (ethereum#5)
c3365a4
just-a-node pushed a commit to connext/EIPs that referenced this issue Feb 17, 2024
@steven2308 @just-a-node
Moves 7409 to final. (ethereum#5)
05b67dc
jacobkaufmann pushed a commit to jacobkaufmann/EIPs that referenced this issue Oct 9, 2024
@soispoke
Merge pull request ethereum#5 from Ma-Julian/master
b9c254e 
Change local ILs to include full transactions instead of a tx summary
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@wanderer @obscuren