EIP-1202 stagnant ([email protected])

[eth-bot]

This EIP has not been active since ([email protected]); which, is greater than the allowed time of 6 months.

authors: @xinbenlv, @evbots, @yingogobot

[xinbenlv]

@eth-bot please close per #3848

[alita-moore]

@xinbenlv can you leave a request changes review? the bot can't interpret it otherwise

[xinbenlv]

@alita-moore, already did in #4190

[alita-moore]

also @MicahZoltu do we want a feature to also consider PRs open against the file?

[alita-moore]

@xinbenlv what I'm saying is can you please leave a negative review on this PR; it can be used later for determining if it should open a PR

[xinbenlv]

love to comply, how do i do that(what do you mean "when you say leave a negative review"?) can you give example?

[alita-moore]

@xinbenlv

[MicahZoltu]

also @MicahZoltu do we want a feature to also consider PRs open against the file?

Yes, we should only open these if there are no pending PRs against the EIP.

[MicahZoltu]

We shouldn't be leaving these open once an author has created a PR to update. Otherwise we just end up with a double-PRs against such EIPs which can be confusing.

[alita-moore]

We shouldn't be leaving these open once an author has created a PR to update. Otherwise we just end up with a double-PRs against such EIPs which can be confusing.

Okay, do you mind adding this as a feature request in the eip-bot repo?

[MicahZoltu]

@xinbenlv You may see the bot open another of these next week, which we apologize for. Just link to your open PR and we'll close the PR just like here. ethereum/EIP-Bot#17 will fix this, but it may not be implemented before the next round of bot actions.