Add EIP-5252: Account-bound Finance

[hskang9]

When opening a pull request to submit a new EIP, please use the suggested template: https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/eip-template.md

We have a GitHub bot that automatically merges some PRs. It will merge yours immediately if certain criteria are met:

• The PR edits only existing draft PRs.
• The build passes.
• Your GitHub username or email address is listed in the 'author' header of all affected PRs, inside .
• If matching on email address, the email address is the one publicly listed on your GitHub profile.

[eth-bot]

A critical exception has occurred:
Message: pr 5252 is already merged; quitting
(cc @alita-moore, @mryalamanchi)

[MicahZoltu]

See also the CI failures.

[github-actions]

The commit 2b3f246 (as a parent of ee58e8f) contains errors. Please inspect the Run Summary for details.

[hskang9]

@xinbenlv Is there anything that needs to be done in the general interface?

[Pandapip1]

There isn't anything more that needs to be done. @eth-bot is borking. Let me re-run it.

[hskang9]

@Pandapip1 @MicahZoltu @xinbenlv I would be appreciated for the next steps to finalize this EIP.

[Pandapip1]

The next step before moving an EIP to review is to solicit feedback. Tell people on the internet who might be interested in your EIP. Ask them to review it and provide feedback. After you feel like you've asked enough people, submit a PR that makes those changes and moves the EIP to review.

[hskang9]

Can someone help me on asking solicit feedback? What place is the right place to ask for review? @Pandapip1 @MicahZoltu @xinbenlv

[hskang9]

Can I get help on where to share this for asking solicit feedback? @Pandapip1 @MicahZoltu @xinbenlv @SamWilsn

[Pandapip1]

Can I get help on where to share this for asking solicit feedback? @Pandapip1 @MicahZoltu @xinbenlv @SamWilsn

Micah is no longer an EIP editor and probably doesn't want to be pinged.

Unfortunately, I actually have no idea of what makes a good place to solicit feedback. The ECH discord (linked to in the README) is probably a good place to start. Making your own blog posts is probably also a good idea, as it allows you to delve more into the motivation behind the EIP and some more interesting use cases.

When you share your EIP, you should link both to the EIP itself (https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5252) and the discussions-to link (https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/pr-5252-discussion-account-bound-finance/10027).

Good luck!

P.S. I am more than happy to help contribute to this EIP. Would you like me to submit a PR to make some changes I feel could be usefully made?

[MicahZoltu]

Ironically, your quote of the message that mentioned me caused me to be re-subscribed after having unsubscribed after hskang9's comment. 😆

[hskang9]

After time passed while tracking Do Kwon and other bonanza things going on in crypto, @MicahZoltu I think @Pandapip1 is just talking bullshit and avoiding the responsibility to make solicit feedback. Can I just ask you to review? and is even ethereum magicians an active forum to get feedback? @Pandapip1 are you like SBF where you say you don't know when you have responsibility as an editor?

[hskang9]

@MicahZoltu I guess to look for feedback, I need to give feedback as well. @Pandapip1 I should go back to your every proposal on EIP to give solicit feedback on technical feasibility and actual usability. I don't want this place to be a bunch of stargazers with autism who can just propose idea because it is just cool and their parents like it, so I will do my best to contribute to shut them down.

[Pandapip1]

Editors have a responsibility to ensure quality, and to make the process as open and fair as possible to the most amount of people.

Quite frankly, your EIP draft was lower-quality than most incoming drafts while being 10x the size. You should be thankful that I took the time to review it and make constructive suggestions, rather than ignore it due to its numerous flaws and excessive bloat.

Neither your meritless allegations of xenophobia and plagiarism, nor your combative responses helped endear me to you. So you're right, I should focus on my responsibilities. You're on your own now. The process is well-documented at EIP-1. I wish you the best of luck.

[hskang9]

@Pandapip1 Your comment on this proposal sounds like you just hate a person and his proposal, and you glorify your privilege on being an EIP editor. All of my actions are defense of my right as an EIP proposer from a pathological narcissist who attempts to bend the rule and take over the system in his personal favor. Your responsibility is to review all EIPs as an editor in the rule, not to personally evaluate them based on your cultural, racial background. Your contribution on reviewing this EIP is not really found except picking up grammatical nuance by your perspective, and you are neglecting the fact that @MicahZoltu and @SamWilsn
actually reviewed this and didn't complain about the quality. In fact, I do not understand why this proposal has lower quality from a person who hasn't even coded in solidity in his professional career. Isn't a proposal in better quality if there are more details and more contracts to declare its precise design? If I compare my proposal to your proposal, none of your proposal is feasible and have zero code implementation. But who cares, @vbuterin chose you as an EIP editor. That's what matters for you, right? You judge people low-quality because you are an EIP editor at the end of the day. I guess this community considers the quality based on how close the one is to Ethereum Foundation? If it is, why not make an orgy dorm and start competing each other who has the highest quality of oneself just like FTX? I consider your quotes as gibberish as you never had a related career in the proposal except this voluntary job, but I respect your correction to put your narcissism away and finally state that you focus on your one sole job. Doing something at its best is respectful.

[hskang9]

To be honest, this is absurd lol. An EIP editor saying that a proposal is low-quality because he just does not like the sentences while he can't read a Solidity code nor even make implementation on his idea. Yet, he still says he had done something for good based on his personal feeling...

Neither your meritless allegations of [xenophobia](https://twitter.com/hyungsuk_k/status/1547695380359692288) and [plagiarism](https://twitter.com/hyungsuk_k/status/1550976727912181760), nor your combative responses helped endear me to you.

If you are saying the allegations are meritless, you are repeating the same quote that previous TFL employees were saying. I didn't give up my allegations until I said to medias and law enforcements for 1 year, and now they are in jail for what they felt worthless before. As I said their actions are wrong to public, and it has become a great source of facts to track evidences to their sins. I hope to see you face the same consequences as I try to connect medias and networks as well to know about you. Your attitude towards people are disgusting as you do not seem to treat other people as same. As you talk about "merit", you seem to believe in your deep heart's content that the justice is only for the strong regardless of rules. I do not understand why you stalk my twitter profile, but sharing the tweet is not about general public to see the post unlike your feelings. It is for the networks of people tracking down disgusting bad actors in this industry like you. As you pretend to walk away and focus on your feelings without actual thought, I will take my chances to get clarification and solution for this nonsense no matter how long it takes.

Also, did you just say "endear me"..? This quote is never an attitude from a public organization should have. If it is, Ethereum Foundation is a private entity, and @Pandapip1 is the CEO who can give endless benefit if one is close to him like Do Kwon. At the end of the day, this EIP goes on, not because you liked it or not, neither in high or low quality, it just had an minimal code and explanation just like every other proposers unlike yours. You do not have a right to say about a quality of a proposal when you can't even make a valid one with actually working code. A honest feedback is what I seek for, not your personal "feelings" or opinion on quality. As I say again, I protect my right as an EIP proposer. I share this tweet to publicize this problem. https://twitter.com/hyungsuk_k/status/1641547535343812615?s=20 You can still undervalue my freedom of speech I have with your unworthy status as an EIP editor earned from brown nosing your owners. Fathers of your nation despise you, such a shame.

[hskang9]

@vbuterin @MicahZoltu @SamWilsn can I and @smuxx get a proper amen on this ERC review?

[SamWilsn]

This pull request has been merged. Please continue any discussion on the technical merits of the proposal on its discussion thread and any other comments on relevant pull requests. Thanks!