Update EIP-2681: Minor clarification

[xinbenlv]

@axic: I was minorly confused by the wording so I propose some clarification..

Change from

Limit account nonce to be between `0` and `2^64-1`.

to Option 1

Limit account nonce to be between `0` and `2^64-1`(inclusive).

or Option 2

Limit account nonce to be `0<=account_nonce<=2^64-1`

to clarify in the summary the inclusivity of two ends

[eth-bot]

Hi! I'm a bot, and I wanted to automerge your PR, but couldn't because of the following issue(s):

---

(fail) eip-2681.md

classification
updateEIP

• eip-2681.md requires approval from one of (@axic)

[github-actions]

The commit 005fe3b (as a parent of 1232e53) contains errors. Please inspect the Run Summary for details.

[Pandapip1]

I, personally, am fine with this change. It only changes the abstract and introduces a useful clarification.

[xinbenlv]

Thank you. Since there is no concern on the editor side, I will leave it to the author to make a choice of the 3 options or leave it as-is: @axic

[github-actions]

There has been no activity on this pull request for 2 weeks. It will be closed after 3 months of inactivity. If you would like to move this PR forward, please respond to any outstanding feedback or add a comment indicating that you have addressed all required feedback and are ready for a review.

[xinbenlv]

Friendly ping author @axic

[lightclient]

I prefer option 2 over option 1, but generally don't think a change is necessary here.

[xinbenlv]

Thanks @lightclient. I like option 2 better too.

I was personally confused by original wording hence the PR. Let's see if @axic think needed? I am ok either way.

[xinbenlv]

@axic friendly ping for author approval. Or let me know if this PR is useful or shall be dropped

[axic]

The inclusive wording is materially incorrect.

The specification states:

1. Consider any transaction invalid, where the nonce exceeds or equals to 2^64-1.

[xinbenlv]

Oh, yes you are right. (embarrassed... I was such an idiot T.T ....)

Updated to 0<=account_nonce<2^64-1.

Please feel free to reject this PR and I will withdraw if you think this is not necessary. @axic

[axic]

The bot states only:

eip-2681.md requires approval from one of (@axic)

I wonder if it is not displaying the warning anymore that this is modifying a Final EIP?

[github-actions]

There has been no activity on this pull request for 2 weeks. It will be closed after 3 months of inactivity. If you would like to move this PR forward, please respond to any outstanding feedback or add a comment indicating that you have addressed all required feedback and are ready for a review.

[github-actions]

This pull request was closed due to inactivity. If you are still pursuing it, feel free to reopen it and respond to any feedback or request a review in a comment.