Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update EIP-4844: Update eip-4844.md #7041

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ralexstokes
Copy link
Member

My understanding is that we have moved away from having a single aggregate proof included in the network wrapper and now instead send one proof per blob.

There is an accelerated way to verify the entire batch (cf. https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/blob/dev/specs/deneb/polynomial-commitments.md#verify_blob_kzg_proof_batch) but it seems that it is in the spirit of the EIP to leave this out of scope. I think the current text was left over during an edit done previously.

Reflect lists of proofs per blob and allude to an optimized routine, rather than write text that suggests we only have one proof (following the optimized routine)
@ralexstokes ralexstokes requested a review from eth-bot as a code owner May 17, 2023 21:38
@github-actions github-actions bot added c-update Modifies an existing proposal s-review This EIP is in Review t-core labels May 17, 2023
@eth-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

eth-bot commented May 17, 2023

File EIPS/eip-4844.md

Requires 1 more reviewers from @adietrichs, @asn-d6, @dankrad, @Inphi, @lightclient, @protolambda, @vbuterin

@eth-bot eth-bot changed the title Update eip-4844.md Update EIP-4844: Update eip-4844.md May 17, 2023
@eth-bot eth-bot added the a-review Waiting on author to review label May 17, 2023
@lightclient
Copy link
Member

closed via #7038

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
a-review Waiting on author to review c-update Modifies an existing proposal s-review This EIP is in Review t-core
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants