Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

eth/gasestimator: include blobs in virtual balance computation #29703

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 7, 2024
Merged

eth/gasestimator: include blobs in virtual balance computation #29703

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
f83fe44
Fix: eth_estimateGas with blobs fails when capped by limited funds
nand2 May 3, 2024
fcee524
blobBalanceUsage: Adding check for balance.
nand2 May 7, 2024
a976688
Update gasestimator.go
fjl May 7, 2024
e41244d
Update gasestimator.go
fjl May 7, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions eth/gasestimator/gasestimator.go
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -80,6 +80,11 @@ func Estimate(ctx context.Context, call *core.Message, opts *Options, gasCap uin
}
available.Sub(available, call.Value)
}
if opts.Config.IsCancun(opts.Header.Number, opts.Header.Time) && len(call.BlobHashes) > 0 {
blobBalanceUsage := new(big.Int).SetInt64(int64(len(call.BlobHashes) * params.BlobTxBlobGasPerBlob))
blobBalanceUsage.Mul(blobBalanceUsage, call.BlobGasFeeCap)
available.Sub(available, blobBalanceUsage)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we need another check for balance > blobBalanceUsage here, otherwise it could go negative.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@nand2 nand2 May 6, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're right! Which one of the following options would you use for the error?

  • Using core.ErrInsufficientFunds as error, keeping insufficient funds for gas * price + value as description,
  • Using core.ErrInsufficientFunds as error, changing description to insufficient funds for gas * price + blobGas * blobGasPrice + value as description,
  • creating and using a new error, ErrEip4844InsufficientFunds with insufficient funds for gas * price + blobGas * blobGasPrice + value as description ?

I guess option 3?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added option 1/ for now, let me know.

}
allowance := new(big.Int).Div(available, feeCap)

// If the allowance is larger than maximum uint64, skip checking
Expand Down