-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 758
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New release 2.5: Constantinople, StateManager, Consensus #391
Comments
Ah, and @mattdean-digicatapult, do you think you can do an API doc PR (eventually with some API tweaks discussed) until Monday or latest Tuesday morning? |
@holgerd77 from my side |
I will try to get #172 fixed today, but don't want to block the release on it. Hopefully it makes it into master by Monday. |
@holgerd77, I don't think I'll get the API docs finished today (other work commitments) but I should be able to get this in on Monday. |
@axic Cool! @mattdean-digicatapult: ok, thanks! |
#394 😄 (most insane release notes I have ever written! 🐓 😎) |
Would do a release tomorrow on this if there is no objection or need for further discussion or changes. |
Closed by #394. |
//cc @mattdean-digicatapult, @axic, @rmeissner
Since we are making good progress on both Constantinople
EXTCODEHASH
and the StateManager changes, I would now target av2.5.0
release for the VM next Wednesday, November 21st, will open this issue here if there is some need for discussion around this.EXTCODEHASH
@rmeissner: let me know if you have reservations regarding the
EXTCODEHASH
implementation, but this should be more-or-less ready, or am I wrong?StateManager
@mattdean-digicatapult (and everyone reading):
Regarding the
StateManager
I would take the following approach: for at least this release and probably 2-3 more I would keep theStateManager
within the VM, I think we should expose the API and move the status fromexperimental
tobeta
. If people are already integrating with/do manipulations on the current/previous state manager, I would encourage them very much in the release notes to update to the changed-here API and follow-up on further changes. In the coming 2-3 releases of the VM I would do separateStateMangager
changes release notes and at some point we should shift to arelease candidate
version.My idea for documentation of the API for this release would be, that we keep this separate, maybe simply do a doc build by manual command, e.g.
documentation build ./lib/stateManger.js --format md --shallow > ./docs/stateManager.md
(not tested, just for inspiration), and link from a separate paragraph within the API section of the README doing some explanations along. Does this make sense?
After these stabelizing releases, I do think we should target to extract the
StateManager
from the VM, with the main benefit that this will largely help internally to keep a stable API on this and from a user perspective helps to switch state managers and also increases confidence in the stability of the API. There are also some other benefits like code size on exchange and reusability for other purposes.On top note: this might also trigger more dedicated work on the state manager itself, like people working on different cache backends or the like.
A
StateManager
extracting release should then be labelledv3.0.0
.So far to the
StateManger
, everyone having suggestions or questions on the release or the notes above please comment!The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: