Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

localstore: preliminary changes related to postage stamps/batches #933

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

zelig
Copy link
Member

@zelig zelig commented Nov 10, 2020

this incomplete PR implements preliminary changes to localstore related to postage stamps as captured in architecture proposals #895 and #898

missing

  • migrations
  • test for postageBatchChunksIndex
  • count for chunks of batch in node's neighbourhood (for validation)

potential technical debt:

  • stamp should be compulsory argument of swarm.NewChunk

@zelig zelig requested review from janos and acud November 10, 2020 08:32
@zelig zelig self-assigned this Nov 10, 2020
Base automatically changed from stamper to storage-incentives November 12, 2020 05:27
@zelig zelig force-pushed the postage-localstore branch 2 times, most recently from 5f4fc3b to c5e2271 Compare November 16, 2020 22:55
@Eknir
Copy link
Contributor

Eknir commented Nov 30, 2020

Please attach this one to an issue. If no issue exists -- make an issue. Thanks

@acud acud force-pushed the storage-incentives branch 2 times, most recently from 134fa9a to cbd4d4a Compare December 7, 2020 15:55
postage: new pkg for postage stamps, uploader stamping (#890)

* postage: new pkg for postage stamps, uploader stamping

* postage: amount->value, blockNumber big.Int-> uint64, stamp only has batch ID, not Batch

* postage: fix godoc and copyright

* postage, swarm:
 - swarm.Stamp as an interface
 - add postage/testing for mock Stamps
 - fix Stamp MarshalBinary to allow nil batch id and signature
 - add StampSize const

* postage: heed review feedback

Co-authored-by: acud <[email protected]>
@zelig zelig marked this pull request as ready for review December 9, 2020 06:42
@acud acud closed this Jan 15, 2021
@acud acud reopened this Jan 15, 2021
@Eknir Eknir closed this Jan 21, 2021
@Eknir Eknir reopened this Jan 21, 2021
@Eknir
Copy link
Contributor

Eknir commented Jan 21, 2021

@acud , this PR is in the QA and Documentation workspaces in the Done column. For me, it can be closed, but I see now that this is still active. Could you please let me know about the status of this issue?

@acud acud force-pushed the storage-incentives branch 2 times, most recently from 039d4ab to a1094ff Compare February 1, 2021 10:36
@zelig
Copy link
Member Author

zelig commented Feb 24, 2021

obsoleted by #1321

@zelig zelig closed this Feb 24, 2021
@vladopajic vladopajic deleted the postage-localstore branch November 18, 2022 11:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants