Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fides: add System model support for new tcf fields #4228

Merged

Conversation

adamsachs
Copy link
Contributor

@adamsachs adamsachs commented Oct 5, 2023

Closes #4227

Description Of Changes

Adds support in fides for the new fields on the System and PrivacyDeclaration model added to fideslang.

  • System.cookie_max_age_seconds
  • System.cookie_refresh
  • System.uses_cookies
  • System.uses_non_cookie_access
  • System.legitimate_interest_disclosure_url
  • PrivacyDeclaration.flexible_legal_basis_for_processing

Code Changes

Steps to Confirm

  • additional fields can't be set yet in the datamap UI - but i ensured they could be set manually via API using the following payload with a PUT /system
{"fides_key":"ts1","organization_fides_key":"default_organization","tags":[],"name":"ts1","description":"","registry_id":null,"meta":null,"fidesctl_meta":null,"system_type":"","data_responsibility_title":null,"egress":null,"ingress":null,"privacy_declarations":[{"name":"pd1", "flexible_legal_basis_for_profiling": true, "data_categories":["system.operations"],"data_use":"analytics.reporting.ad_performance","data_subjects":[],"features":[],"impact_assessment_location":"","retention_period":"","processes_special_category_data":false,"data_shared_with_third_parties":false,"customFieldValues":{},"cookies":[],"id":""}],"joint_controller":null,"third_country_transfers":null,"administrating_department":"","data_protection_impact_assessment":null,"vendor_id":null,"dataset_references":[],"processes_personal_data":true,"exempt_from_privacy_regulations":false,"reason_for_exemption":null,"uses_profiling":false,"legal_basis_for_profiling":[],"does_international_transfers":false,"legal_basis_for_transfers":[],"requires_data_protection_assessments":false,"dpa_location":null,"dpa_progress":null,"privacy_policy":null,"legal_name":"","legal_address":"","responsibility":[],"dpo":"","joint_controller_info":"","data_security_practices":"","cookie_max_age_seconds":355,"uses_cookies":true,"cookie_refresh":true,"uses_non_cookie_access":true,"legitimate_interest_disclosure_url":"http://testurl.com","created_at":"2023-10-11T16:15:54.925759+00:00","connection_configs":null,"data_stewards":[],"cookies":[]}
  • confirm that a sample TCF overlay has these fields populated

Pre-Merge Checklist

@adamsachs adamsachs force-pushed the asachs/4227-addtl-tcf-fields-system branch 2 times, most recently from 433d4b7 to 2f2633c Compare October 5, 2023 20:23
@cypress
Copy link

cypress bot commented Oct 5, 2023

Passing run #4580 ↗︎

0 4 0 0 Flakiness 0
⚠️ You've recorded test results over your free plan limit.
Upgrade your plan to view test results.

Details:

Merge 18144fa into 7783dd5...
Project: fides Commit: 2cee94b174 ℹ️
Status: Passed Duration: 00:52 💡
Started: Oct 11, 2023 10:07 PM Ended: Oct 11, 2023 10:08 PM

Review all test suite changes for PR #4228 ↗︎

@adamsachs adamsachs force-pushed the asachs/4227-addtl-tcf-fields-system branch from 2f2633c to 36ea973 Compare October 6, 2023 11:24
@adamsachs adamsachs force-pushed the asachs/4227-addtl-tcf-fields-system branch from 36ea973 to ce5c491 Compare October 11, 2023 16:22
@adamsachs adamsachs changed the base branch from main to integration/compass-1.0.0 October 11, 2023 16:30
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 11, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified lines are covered by tests ✅

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (integration/compass-1.0.0@7783dd5). Click here to learn what that means.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                     Coverage Diff                      @@
##             integration/compass-1.0.0    #4228   +/-   ##
============================================================
  Coverage                             ?   87.74%           
============================================================
  Files                                ?      331           
  Lines                                ?    20895           
  Branches                             ?     2710           
============================================================
  Hits                                 ?    18334           
  Misses                               ?     2094           
  Partials                             ?      467           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@adamsachs adamsachs marked this pull request as ready for review October 11, 2023 18:33
@adamsachs
Copy link
Contributor Author

i've got a changelog commit queued up locally, just didn't want to push to re-trigger CI - writing this so i don't forget to push it up!

@pattisdr
Copy link
Contributor

starting review -

Copy link
Contributor

@pattisdr pattisdr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great @adamsachs. I know we're not ready to bump a fideslang requirement here, but did you test locally with a fideslang alpha release here to make sure this will work as expected?

tests/ctl/core/test_api.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
EmbeddedVendor(id="sendgrid", name="TCF System Test")
]

assert tcf_contents.tcf_vendor_consents[0].id == "sendgrid"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is something that will be affected with my PR: #4256, I stop making the vendor_id: "sendgrid". Just something to sort out on merge, for whoever merges second 😄

src/fides/api/util/tcf/tcf_experience_contents.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@adamsachs
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looks great @adamsachs. I know we're not ready to bump a fideslang requirement here, but did you test locally with a fideslang alpha release here to make sure this will work as expected?

yup! the base branch is pointed at a fideslang alpha tag, so this branch is too, it's just not showing up in the diff 👍

@pattisdr
Copy link
Contributor

yup! the base branch is pointed at a fideslang alpha tag, so this branch is too, it's just not showing up in the diff 👍

Ah! 😅 missed that thank you

adamsachs and others added 2 commits October 11, 2023 17:09
this also ensures that VendorRelationship records are created for ANY vendor record in the overlay
… declarations query instead of using the vendor_id to conditionally filter.

- define the vendor_relationship_record early so we can assign its basic attributes in one place.
@pattisdr
Copy link
Contributor

OK I think this is ready when CI passes - I'm waiting on whether separate #4256 should be merged to main since these sets of changes need to be reconciled. Wanted to double check since I've missed some context around the integration branch the last couple of days.

@adamsachs
Copy link
Contributor Author

OK I think this is ready when CI passes - I'm waiting on whether separate #4256 should be merged to main since these sets of changes need to be reconciled. Wanted to double check since I've missed some context around the integration branch the last couple of days.

great, i'll go ahead and merge this one first since i think it's got more dependencies on it 🤷

we need to make both work, and i don't think the conflicts will be different no matter which we merge first...

@adamsachs adamsachs merged commit 04fc4f8 into integration/compass-1.0.0 Oct 12, 2023
37 checks passed
@adamsachs adamsachs deleted the asachs/4227-addtl-tcf-fields-system branch October 12, 2023 01:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

fides: support new TCF related fields on System model
2 participants