Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make primary key typing stricter #904

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Sep 10, 2024
Merged

Conversation

evroon
Copy link
Owner

@evroon evroon commented Sep 10, 2024

No description provided.

@evroon evroon self-assigned this Sep 10, 2024
Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 10, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
bracket ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Sep 10, 2024 6:27pm

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 10, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 98.42105% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 93.13%. Comparing base (b3073c0) to head (223d648).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
backend/bracket/logic/planning/rounds.py 66.66% 1 Missing ⚠️
backend/bracket/routes/users.py 80.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
backend/bracket/utils/db_init.py 91.66% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #904      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   93.17%   93.13%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         112      112              
  Lines        3912     3891      -21     
==========================================
- Hits         3645     3624      -21     
  Misses        267      267              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@evroon evroon merged commit 388afa5 into master Sep 10, 2024
9 checks passed
@evroon evroon deleted the make-primary-key-typing-stricter branch September 10, 2024 18:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant