Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Define a Code of Conduct team and have a dedicated email for it #2

Open
2 tasks
choldgraf opened this issue Jul 1, 2022 · 2 comments
Open
2 tasks

Comments

@choldgraf
Copy link
Member

choldgraf commented Jul 1, 2022

Context

As a part of #3, I noticed that in our Code of Conduct we do not list who responds to Code of Conduct reports, and who monitors the email that is listed there.

It's important to be explicit about who monitors Code of Conduct reports, so that people that might make these reports know what to expect. Moreover, it's important that the teams that monitor CoC channels have expertise in handling matters like this, as they can be quite sensitive.

Finally, I noted that the contact email there is [email protected], which is a single-user account. We could share the emails to this account between team members, but it'll be easier to make it explicit who has access to the account, and to add / remove people, if we use a Group account for this.

Note that if we successfully incorporate as a Jupyter sub-project, we'll inherit Jupyter's Code of Conduct processes, which are similar to what I've described above.

Proposal

Unless others object, I'll plan to do the following:

  • Create a Google Group that is dedicated for CoC reports
  • Make it possible to message the group from the outside, but messages are only visible to group members.
  • Put the Sloan Project Principal Investigators as members of this group
  • Re-direct our CoC guidelines to report to this group
  • Add a PR to our team compass to make the CoC more visible and to make this process explicit

In the future, there are a few other things that we need to do to improve this process, but we can leave that to a follow-up:

  • Define a more "formal" CoC process
  • Define a team of people with formal training in how to handle these issues
  • Make it possible to submit reports anonymously
  • Make it possible to submit reports outside of this process, in case people don't want the readers of the account to see the report.

There are two PRs related to this one:

This is also related to:

References

There's a ton of information out there about CoCs, but here are two useful ones:

@rowanc1
Copy link
Member

rowanc1 commented Jul 1, 2022

Thanks for your work here @choldgraf, I reviewed the two PRs linked and both look great. Especially acknowledging the current state in the code of conduct, our progress towards the community goals that you have outlined, as well opening various documented community communication lines. I think it makes a lot of sense to bootstrap with the Sloan Project Principal Investigators as initial members of this group as you suggest.

@welcome
Copy link

welcome bot commented Oct 28, 2022

Thanks for opening your first issue here! Engagement like this is essential for open source projects! 🤗

If you haven't done so already, check out EBP's Code of Conduct. Also, please try to follow the issue template as it helps other community members to contribute more effectively.

If your issue is a feature request, others may react to it, to raise its prominence (see Feature Voting).

Welcome to the EBP community! 🎉

@choldgraf choldgraf transferred this issue from executablebooks/meta Oct 28, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants