Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Doe categorical #243

Merged
merged 104 commits into from
Aug 11, 2023
Merged

Doe categorical #243

merged 104 commits into from
Aug 11, 2023

Conversation

ufukguenes
Copy link
Contributor

Attempt at including categorical variables and discrete variables in DOE. Solving with exhaustive search and branch-and-bound

Copy link
Contributor

@dlinzner-bcs dlinzner-bcs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks fine to me! Thank you so much for all the great work @ufukguenes 💯

@ufukguenes ufukguenes closed this Aug 11, 2023
@ufukguenes ufukguenes reopened this Aug 11, 2023
@ufukguenes ufukguenes merged commit 126393e into main Aug 11, 2023
17 of 20 checks passed
@jduerholt
Copy link
Contributor

@dlinzner-bcs and @ufukguenes : have you seen that the pyright test was not passing when you merged the PR in?

@dlinzner-bcs
Copy link
Contributor

@jduerholt yes I saw that. I plan to clean it up asap. Is this critical? We wanted to have the additional functionality before ufuk left.

@jduerholt
Copy link
Contributor

Hmm, I am also a bit irritated that we still have additional feature types in, I thought that we agreed on not having additional ones ...

@jduerholt
Copy link
Contributor

Honestly, I would prefer to revert the merge and proper discuss it and see if we can do it without the addional features.

ufukguenes added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2023
dlinzner-bcs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants