Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: add back noErrors = false to emitSkipped #381

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 12, 2022

Conversation

agilgur5
Copy link
Collaborator

Summary

Make noErrors = false unconditional again in emitSkipped

Details

- apparently `emitSkipped` can indeed happen without there being a semantic or syntactic error
  - so add back the previous unconditional behavior of `noErrors`

- still not clear what exactly triggers `emitSkipped` though, see my TS issue
@agilgur5 agilgur5 added the kind: regression Specific type of bug -- past behavior that worked is now broken label Jul 10, 2022
@ezolenko ezolenko merged commit dcae517 into ezolenko:master Jul 12, 2022
@agilgur5
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Oh... well I didn't quite realize this (was refactoring/simplifying this code a bit after all), but this is totally redundant because this.error bails out anyway, so the single log statement that noErrors is used for will never be reached anyway 😐

@agilgur5 agilgur5 deleted the fix-no-errors-emitSkipped branch July 2, 2023 21:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind: regression Specific type of bug -- past behavior that worked is now broken
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants