#427 Lazy operands for short-circuit evaluation of logic operators #432
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
uklimaschewski
approved these changes
Jan 16, 2024
|
Thank you very much! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This implementation changes existing
&&and||operators and it seems to be fine. Alternatively we can keep the existing operators unchanged but then we need to add tests for using custom operators. I can see currently all features such asisLazyfrom functionParameter are used at least once by one of the built-in operator/function so I last time I checked, I didn't find tests for implementing some features purely for the purpose of being used by custom operator/function.This fixes: #427