Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run unknown dependency ingestion on bayesianApiFlow #200

Merged

Conversation

samuzzal-choudhury
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Currently, the unknown ingestion flow on the server backbone uses bayesianFlow. Bayesian Flow is used by the ingestion process as well. So, it is highly possible that unknown dependency ingestion gets delayed because it gets added to an already heavily populated queue.

Fixes # (issue)

To use the BayesianApiFlow that ensures that the unknown dependency ingestion is added to another dedicated queue for Api level ingestions. This will ensure faster ingestion.

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #200 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 0%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #200   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    90.9%   90.9%           
======================================
  Files           4       4           
  Lines         902     902           
======================================
  Hits          820     820           
  Misses         82      82
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/stack_aggregator.py 91.42% <0%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7e4794e...c312e63. Read the comment docs.

@centos-ci
Copy link
Collaborator

@samuzzal-choudhury Your image is available in the registry: docker pull quay.io/openshiftio/rhel-fabric8-analytics-f8a-server-backbone:SNAPSHOT-PR-200

Copy link
Member

@yzainee-zz yzainee-zz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants