Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add extract_pending_observations function that auto-deploys to the correct pending-points function for the use case #2039

Closed

Conversation

lena-kashtelyan
Copy link
Contributor

Summary:
For automated extraction of pending points, it would be ideal to not have to separately call one of two functions: get_pending... and get_pending_..._based_on_trial_status. I think we only want to go the latter route when: all trials are 1-arm and there are many trials.
Planning to use this for pending points extraction from within the ExternalGenerationStrategy (in time we might use this in other places, too, e.g. the Scheduler).

Differential Revision: D51684966

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity. label Dec 1, 2023
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D51684966

lena-kashtelyan added a commit to lena-kashtelyan/Ax that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2023
…correct pending-points function for the use case (facebook#2039)

Summary:

For automated extraction of pending points, it would be ideal to not have to separately call one of two functions: get_pending... and get_pending_..._based_on_trial_status. I think we only want to go the latter route when: all trials are 1-arm and there are many trials.
Planning to use this for pending points extraction from within the ExternalGenerationStrategy (in time we might use this in other places, too, e.g. the Scheduler).

Differential Revision: D51684966
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D51684966

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Dec 5, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (79133c7) 94.52% compared to head (da00884) 94.52%.

❗ Current head da00884 differs from pull request most recent head 999b7c3. Consider uploading reports for the commit 999b7c3 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2039      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.52%   94.52%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         460      460              
  Lines       44522    44543      +21     
==========================================
+ Hits        42086    42105      +19     
- Misses       2436     2438       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

lena-kashtelyan added a commit to lena-kashtelyan/Ax that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2023
…correct pending-points function for the use case (facebook#2039)

Summary:

For automated extraction of pending points, it would be ideal to not have to separately call one of two functions: get_pending... and get_pending_..._based_on_trial_status. I think we only want to go the latter route when: all trials are 1-arm and there are many trials.
Planning to use this for pending points extraction from within the ExternalGenerationStrategy (in time we might use this in other places, too, e.g. the Scheduler).

Differential Revision: D51684966
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D51684966

lena-kashtelyan added a commit to lena-kashtelyan/Ax that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2023
…correct pending-points function for the use case (facebook#2039)

Summary:

For automated extraction of pending points, it would be ideal to not have to separately call one of two functions: get_pending... and get_pending_..._based_on_trial_status. I think we only want to go the latter route when: all trials are 1-arm and there are many trials.
Planning to use this for pending points extraction from within the ExternalGenerationStrategy (in time we might use this in other places, too, e.g. the Scheduler).

Differential Revision: D51684966
…correct pending-points function for the use case (facebook#2039)

Summary:
Pull Request resolved: facebook#2039

For automated extraction of pending points, it would be ideal to not have to separately call one of two functions: get_pending... and get_pending_..._based_on_trial_status. I think we only want to go the latter route when: all trials are 1-arm and there are many trials.
Planning to use this for pending points extraction from within the ExternalGenerationStrategy (in time we might use this in other places, too, e.g. the Scheduler).

Differential Revision: D51684966

fbshipit-source-id: 4bc2ee0f8dfe69801cbc1da9d16bb8f3054390be
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D51684966

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been merged in c14ff08.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity. fb-exported Merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants