Get rid of SingleObjectiveBenchmarkProblem
#2606
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
facebook-github-bot
added
the
CLA Signed
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D60285191 |
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D60285191 |
esantorella
added a commit
to esantorella/Ax
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 28, 2024
Summary: Pull Request resolved: facebook#2606 The class is not adding anything. We should check if problems are single-objective by looking at the type of their `optimization_config`. This PR: * Removes `SingleObjectiveBenchmarkProblem` * Replaces all references to it with `BenchmarkProblem` * Removes `get_benchmark_problem`, which is redundant with `get_single_objective_benchmark_problem` Reviewed By: dme65 Differential Revision: D60285191
esantorella
force-pushed
the
export-D60285191
branch
from
0e4a1ae
to
285caf8
Compare
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2606 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 95.20% 95.21%
=======================================
Files 495 495
Lines 47745 47720 -25
=======================================
- Hits 45456 45435 -21
+ Misses 2289 2285 -4 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
…k#2603) Summary: Pull Request resolved: facebook#2603 Context: Surrogate benchmark problems allow for downloading datasets and constructing a surrogate lazily. Since the surrogates and datasets are only needed for the `Runner`, it makes sense to confine this logic to `SurrogateRunner`. This gives surrogate benchmark problems an interface that is much clsoer to that of non-surrogate benchmark problems. In the future, we should be able to get down to just one `BenchmarkProblem` class. This PR: * Moves lazy construction of surrogates from the `Problem` to the `Runner`. * Moves corresponding unit tests from the problem's file to the runner's. * Removes the attribute `noise_stds` from the problem, since it duplicates the same attribute on the runner and doesn't conform to the interface of other benchmark problems. * Requires `is_noiseless` to be provided at problem initialization, to make surrogate problems have the same interface as other problems, and adds an attribute `SurrogateRunner.is_noiseless` so that this is not difficult to provide. Differential Revision: D60266288 Reviewed By: saitcakmak
…eritance (facebook#2601) Summary: Pull Request resolved: facebook#2601 Context: * Problems that lack an `optimal_value` get a NaN score and cannot really be used for benchmarking except when aggregated. This is a nasty "gotcha." We don't always know the optimum, but IMO it is better to guess. * The inheritance structure of benchmark problems is too complex and will make subsequent refactors harder. This PR: * Adds an `optimal_value` requirement to `BenchmarkProblem` and makes `BenchmarkProblem` the base class to `SurrogateBenchmarkProblem`, enabling `BenchmarkProblem` to be the only type annotation needed. Therefore, the type annotation `BenchmarkProblemProtocol` is no longer necessary. It will be removed in the next PR. * No longer allows for giving an NaN score to benchmarks where the problem lacks an optimal value, because this won't happen. * Updates a lot of annotations. * Raises an exception for constrained multi-objective problems. * Use dataclasses to cut down on code. Differential Revision: D60145193 Reviewed By: saitcakmak
…e annotations (facebook#2602) Summary: Pull Request resolved: facebook#2602 These are no longer necessary. See previous PR for context. This change reaps them and updates type annotations. Differential Revision: D60146081 Reviewed By: saitcakmak
Summary: Pull Request resolved: facebook#2605 Context: Benchmark problems are sometimes created with class methods `SingleObjectiveBenchmarkProblem.from_botorch`, `SingleObjectiveBenchmarkProblem.from_botorch_synthetic`, and `MultiObjectiveBenchmarkProblem.from_botorch_multi_objective`, the former two now being identical. This creates the need for some tricky type annotations; to me, replacing these with functions is obviously cleaner. This will make it easier to consolidate classes in the future. This PR: * Replaces `SingleObjectiveBenchmarkProblem.from_botorch` and `SingleObjectiveBenchmarkProblem.from_botorch_synthetic` with `create_single_objective_problem_from_botorch` * Replaces `MultiObjectiveBenchmarkProblem.from_botorch_multi_objective` with `create_multi_objective_problem_from_botorch` Differential Revision: D60284484 Reviewed By: saitcakmak
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D60285191 |
esantorella
force-pushed
the
export-D60285191
branch
from
285caf8
to
9d19074
Compare
esantorella
added a commit
to esantorella/Ax
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 28, 2024
Summary: Pull Request resolved: facebook#2606 The class is not adding anything. We should check if problems are single-objective by looking at the type of their `optimization_config`. This PR: * Removes `SingleObjectiveBenchmarkProblem` * Replaces all references to it with `BenchmarkProblem` * Removes `get_benchmark_problem`, which is redundant with `get_single_objective_benchmark_problem` Reviewed By: dme65 Differential Revision: D60285191
Summary: Pull Request resolved: facebook#2606 The class is not adding anything. We should check if problems are single-objective by looking at the type of their `optimization_config`. This PR: * Removes `SingleObjectiveBenchmarkProblem` * Replaces all references to it with `BenchmarkProblem` * Removes `get_benchmark_problem`, which is redundant with `get_single_objective_benchmark_problem` Reviewed By: dme65 Differential Revision: D60285191
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D60285191 |
esantorella
force-pushed
the
export-D60285191
branch
from
9d19074
to
646cef4
Compare
|
This pull request has been merged in af3029f. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary:
The class is not adding anything. We should check if problems are single-objective by looking at the type of their
optimization_config.This PR:
SingleObjectiveBenchmarkProblemBenchmarkProblemget_benchmark_problem, which is redundant withget_single_objective_benchmark_problemDifferential Revision: D60285191