Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reorder vim arguments in launchEditor so --remote works #2723

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 4, 2017

Conversation

trygveaa
Copy link
Contributor

@trygveaa trygveaa commented Jul 4, 2017

This allows you to set REACT_EDITOR to 'vim --remote', so the file can
be opened in an already running vim process. When using vim without
remote, it works in the same way as before.

When launching vim without --remote, the order of the line and path
arguments doesn't matter. However, when using --remote the line argument
has to precede the path. This happens to be the same as joe and emacs
uses, so the vim cases were just moved there.

I haven't tested this with mvim, but the documentation says the same as
the vim documentation, so I assume it works the same.

This allows you to set REACT_EDITOR to 'vim --remote', so the file can
be opened in an already running vim process. When using vim without
remote, it works in the same way as before.

When launching vim without --remote, the order of the line and path
arguments doesn't matter. However, when using --remote the line argument
has to precede the path. This happens to be the same as joe and emacs
uses, so the vim cases were just moved there.

I haven't tested this with mvim, but the documentation says the same as
the vim documentation, so I assume it works the same.
@gaearon
Copy link
Contributor

gaearon commented Jul 4, 2017

Thanks! I haven't tested but trust you this works.

@gaearon gaearon added this to the 1.0.11 milestone Jul 4, 2017
@gaearon gaearon merged commit f495c15 into facebook:master Jul 4, 2017
romaindso pushed a commit to romaindso/create-react-app that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2017
This allows you to set REACT_EDITOR to 'vim --remote', so the file can
be opened in an already running vim process. When using vim without
remote, it works in the same way as before.

When launching vim without --remote, the order of the line and path
arguments doesn't matter. However, when using --remote the line argument
has to precede the path. This happens to be the same as joe and emacs
uses, so the vim cases were just moved there.

I haven't tested this with mvim, but the documentation says the same as
the vim documentation, so I assume it works the same.
@Timer
Copy link
Contributor

Timer commented Aug 9, 2017

Hi there! This change is out in [email protected]; please give it a go! Thanks.

JohnNilsson referenced this pull request in JohnNilsson/create-react-app-typescript Aug 9, 2017
This allows you to set REACT_EDITOR to 'vim --remote', so the file can
be opened in an already running vim process. When using vim without
remote, it works in the same way as before.

When launching vim without --remote, the order of the line and path
arguments doesn't matter. However, when using --remote the line argument
has to precede the path. This happens to be the same as joe and emacs
uses, so the vim cases were just moved there.

I haven't tested this with mvim, but the documentation says the same as
the vim documentation, so I assume it works the same.
morgs32 pushed a commit to BrickworkSoftware/create-react-app that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2017
This allows you to set REACT_EDITOR to 'vim --remote', so the file can
be opened in an already running vim process. When using vim without
remote, it works in the same way as before.

When launching vim without --remote, the order of the line and path
arguments doesn't matter. However, when using --remote the line argument
has to precede the path. This happens to be the same as joe and emacs
uses, so the vim cases were just moved there.

I haven't tested this with mvim, but the documentation says the same as
the vim documentation, so I assume it works the same.
JohnNilsson referenced this pull request in JohnNilsson/create-react-app-typescript Sep 9, 2017
This allows you to set REACT_EDITOR to 'vim --remote', so the file can
be opened in an already running vim process. When using vim without
remote, it works in the same way as before.

When launching vim without --remote, the order of the line and path
arguments doesn't matter. However, when using --remote the line argument
has to precede the path. This happens to be the same as joe and emacs
uses, so the vim cases were just moved there.

I haven't tested this with mvim, but the documentation says the same as
the vim documentation, so I assume it works the same.
kasperpeulen pushed a commit to kasperpeulen/create-react-app that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2017
This allows you to set REACT_EDITOR to 'vim --remote', so the file can
be opened in an already running vim process. When using vim without
remote, it works in the same way as before.

When launching vim without --remote, the order of the line and path
arguments doesn't matter. However, when using --remote the line argument
has to precede the path. This happens to be the same as joe and emacs
uses, so the vim cases were just moved there.

I haven't tested this with mvim, but the documentation says the same as
the vim documentation, so I assume it works the same.
swengorschewski referenced this pull request in swengorschewski/cra-typescript-electron Oct 16, 2017
This allows you to set REACT_EDITOR to 'vim --remote', so the file can
be opened in an already running vim process. When using vim without
remote, it works in the same way as before.

When launching vim without --remote, the order of the line and path
arguments doesn't matter. However, when using --remote the line argument
has to precede the path. This happens to be the same as joe and emacs
uses, so the vim cases were just moved there.

I haven't tested this with mvim, but the documentation says the same as
the vim documentation, so I assume it works the same.
@lock lock bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 21, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants