[compiler] Recompute values every time #29657
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Summary: This PR expands the analysis from the previous in the stack in order to also capture when a value can incorrectly change within a single render, rather than just changing between two renders. In the case where dependencies have changed and so a new value is being computed, we now compute the value twice and compare the results. This would, for example, catch when we call Math.random() in render. The generated code is a little convoluted, because we don't want to have to traverse the generated code and substitute variable names with new ones. Instead, we save the initial value to the cache as normal, then run the computation block again and compare the resulting values to the cached ones. Then, to make sure that the cached values are identical to the computed ones, we reassign the cached values into the output variables. [ghstack-poisoned]
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
This was referenced May 29, 2024
|
Comparing: 63d673c...e4d990b Critical size changesIncludes critical production bundles, as well as any change greater than 2%:
Significant size changesIncludes any change greater than 0.2%: Expand to show
|
Summary: This PR expands the analysis from the previous in the stack in order to also capture when a value can incorrectly change within a single render, rather than just changing between two renders. In the case where dependencies have changed and so a new value is being computed, we now compute the value twice and compare the results. This would, for example, catch when we call Math.random() in render. The generated code is a little convoluted, because we don't want to have to traverse the generated code and substitute variable names with new ones. Instead, we save the initial value to the cache as normal, then run the computation block again and compare the resulting values to the cached ones. Then, to make sure that the cached values are identical to the computed ones, we reassign the cached values into the output variables. [ghstack-poisoned]
Summary: This PR expands the analysis from the previous in the stack in order to also capture when a value can incorrectly change within a single render, rather than just changing between two renders. In the case where dependencies have changed and so a new value is being computed, we now compute the value twice and compare the results. This would, for example, catch when we call Math.random() in render. The generated code is a little convoluted, because we don't want to have to traverse the generated code and substitute variable names with new ones. Instead, we save the initial value to the cache as normal, then run the computation block again and compare the resulting values to the cached ones. Then, to make sure that the cached values are identical to the computed ones, we reassign the cached values into the output variables. [ghstack-poisoned]
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // (changeExpressions.length > 0) || (changeExpressions.length |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nit: missing closing paren here, did this get cut off maybe?
|
One thing to check here is what happens for scopes with reassignments rather than declarations. An example of that is: function Component(props) {
let x = null;
if (props.cond) {
x = [];
x.push(props.value);
}
return x;
}Can you add this as a test case? Otherwise this all looks good |
Summary: This PR expands the analysis from the previous in the stack in order to also capture when a value can incorrectly change within a single render, rather than just changing between two renders. In the case where dependencies have changed and so a new value is being computed, we now compute the value twice and compare the results. This would, for example, catch when we call Math.random() in render. The generated code is a little convoluted, because we don't want to have to traverse the generated code and substitute variable names with new ones. Instead, we save the initial value to the cache as normal, then run the computation block again and compare the resulting values to the cached ones. Then, to make sure that the cached values are identical to the computed ones, we reassign the cached values into the output variables. [ghstack-poisoned]
|
Added! Result looks correct to me AFACT. |
Summary: This PR expands the analysis from the previous in the stack in order to also capture when a value can incorrectly change within a single render, rather than just changing between two renders. In the case where dependencies have changed and so a new value is being computed, we now compute the value twice and compare the results. This would, for example, catch when we call Math.random() in render. The generated code is a little convoluted, because we don't want to have to traverse the generated code and substitute variable names with new ones. Instead, we save the initial value to the cache as normal, then run the computation block again and compare the resulting values to the cached ones. Then, to make sure that the cached values are identical to the computed ones, we reassign the cached values into the output variables. [ghstack-poisoned]
| @@ -498,6 +498,7 @@ const skipFilter = new Set([ | |||
| "useState-pruned-dependency-change-detect", | |||
| "useState-unpruned-dependency", | |||
| "useState-and-other-hook-unpruned-dependency", | |||
| "change-detect-reassign", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
oh interesting, what was the error for this fixture?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It uses the react-compiler-runtime, IIUC that's not available in fixtures right?
josephsavona
approved these changes
May 31, 2024
Summary: This PR expands the analysis from the previous in the stack in order to also capture when a value can incorrectly change within a single render, rather than just changing between two renders. In the case where dependencies have changed and so a new value is being computed, we now compute the value twice and compare the results. This would, for example, catch when we call Math.random() in render. The generated code is a little convoluted, because we don't want to have to traverse the generated code and substitute variable names with new ones. Instead, we save the initial value to the cache as normal, then run the computation block again and compare the resulting values to the cached ones. Then, to make sure that the cached values are identical to the computed ones, we reassign the cached values into the output variables. [ghstack-poisoned]
mvitousek
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 31, 2024
Summary: This PR expands the analysis from the previous in the stack in order to also capture when a value can incorrectly change within a single render, rather than just changing between two renders. In the case where dependencies have changed and so a new value is being computed, we now compute the value twice and compare the results. This would, for example, catch when we call Math.random() in render. The generated code is a little convoluted, because we don't want to have to traverse the generated code and substitute variable names with new ones. Instead, we save the initial value to the cache as normal, then run the computation block again and compare the resulting values to the cached ones. Then, to make sure that the cached values are identical to the computed ones, we reassign the cached values into the output variables. ghstack-source-id: d0f11a4cb2a612cbffdfdcaa9e75efbd6e38019f Pull Request resolved: #29657
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 31, 2024
Summary: This PR expands the analysis from the previous in the stack in order to also capture when a value can incorrectly change within a single render, rather than just changing between two renders. In the case where dependencies have changed and so a new value is being computed, we now compute the value twice and compare the results. This would, for example, catch when we call Math.random() in render. The generated code is a little convoluted, because we don't want to have to traverse the generated code and substitute variable names with new ones. Instead, we save the initial value to the cache as normal, then run the computation block again and compare the resulting values to the cached ones. Then, to make sure that the cached values are identical to the computed ones, we reassign the cached values into the output variables. ghstack-source-id: d0f11a4cb2a612cbffdfdcaa9e75efbd6e38019f Pull Request resolved: #29657 DiffTrain build for commit 522d22f.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
Summary: This PR expands the analysis from the previous in the stack in order to also capture when a value can incorrectly change within a single render, rather than just changing between two renders. In the case where dependencies have changed and so a new value is being computed, we now compute the value twice and compare the results. This would, for example, catch when we call Math.random() in render.
The generated code is a little convoluted, because we don't want to have to traverse the generated code and substitute variable names with new ones. Instead, we save the initial value to the cache as normal, then run the computation block again and compare the resulting values to the cached ones. Then, to make sure that the cached values are identical to the computed ones, we reassign the cached values into the output variables.