Consider dispatch from useActionState stable
#29665
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
facebook-github-bot
added
CLA Signed
React Core Team
|
Comparing: ea6e059...510f053 Critical size changesIncludes critical production bundles, as well as any change greater than 2%:
Significant size changesIncludes any change greater than 0.2%: Expand to show
|
rachitiitr
reviewed
May 30, 2024
rachitiitr
reviewed
May 30, 2024
rachitiitr
reviewed
May 30, 2024
eps1lon
force-pushed
the
useActionState-stable-dispatch
branch
from
f25aca9
to
1e97088
Compare
Closed
4 tasks
|
Should we just do this logic for the new name and not the old one? |
|
It's already out there with the lightest warning that it's just been renamed i.e. you can still use |
josephsavona
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 5, 2024
… is non-reactive (#29705) Summary The dispatch function from useReducer is stable, so it is also non-reactive. the related PR: #29665 the related comment: #29674 (comment) I am not sure if the location of the new test file is appropriate😅. How did you test this change? Added the specific test compiler/packages/babel-plugin-react-compiler/src/__tests__/fixtures/compiler/useReducer-returned-dispatcher-is-non-reactive.expect.md.
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 5, 2024
… is non-reactive (#29705) Summary The dispatch function from useReducer is stable, so it is also non-reactive. the related PR: #29665 the related comment: #29674 (comment) I am not sure if the location of the new test file is appropriate😅. How did you test this change? Added the specific test compiler/packages/babel-plugin-react-compiler/src/__tests__/fixtures/compiler/useReducer-returned-dispatcher-is-non-reactive.expect.md. DiffTrain build for commit 704aeed.
|
Going with just |
eps1lon
changed the title
useActionState and useFormState stableuseActionState stable
|
Aligned with React Compiler to only consider |
gaearon
approved these changes
Jul 5, 2024
This was referenced Jul 25, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
The dispatch function from
useStateanduseReduceris stable soexhaustive-depsdoesn't require them to be in dependencies. This applies the same rule touseActionStateanduseFormStateHow did you test this change?
yarn test packages/eslint-plugin-react-hooks/__tests__/ESLintRuleExhaustiveDeps-test.jsfails with on the first commit but passes on the second.