Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Option to make stdout unbuffered #211

Closed
mstemm opened this issue Feb 26, 2017 · 0 comments · Fixed by #285
Closed

Option to make stdout unbuffered #211

mstemm opened this issue Feb 26, 2017 · 0 comments · Fixed by #285

Comments

@mstemm
Copy link
Contributor

mstemm commented Feb 26, 2017

Add an option to make standard output unbuffered. Sysdig has an --unbuffered option so we should use that name for consistency.

@mstemm mstemm changed the title Option to make stdout buffered Option to make stdout unbuffered Feb 26, 2017
mstemm added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 6, 2017
Add the ability to keep file/program outputs open (i.e. writing to the
same open file/program for multiple notifications). A new option to the
file/program output "keep_alive", if true, keeps the file/program pipe
open across events.

This makes the need for unbuffered output aka
#211 more pressing. Will add that next.
mstemm added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 6, 2017
Add the ability to keep file/program outputs open (i.e. writing to the
same open file/program for multiple notifications). A new option to the
file/program output "keep_alive", if true, keeps the file/program pipe
open across events.

This makes the need for unbuffered output aka
#211 more pressing. Will add that next.
mstemm added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 6, 2017
Add the ability to keep file/program outputs open (i.e. writing to the
same open file/program for multiple notifications). A new option to the
file/program output "keep_alive", if true, keeps the file/program pipe
open across events.

This makes the need for unbuffered output aka
#211 more pressing. Will add that next.
@mstemm mstemm closed this as completed Oct 9, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant