-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 897
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add user_known_mount_in_privileged_containers macro #1930
Add user_known_mount_in_privileged_containers macro #1930
Conversation
Welcome @mmoyerfigma! It looks like this is your first PR to falcosecurity/falco 🎉 |
a96c78b
to
f851897
Compare
This adds a new macro `user_known_mount_in_privileged_containers` which allows the easier user-defined exclusions for the "Mount Launched in Privileged Container" rule. This would be cleaner with the exclusions feature, but this feature is not used in the default ruleset yet, if I understand correctly. Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <[email protected]>
f851897
to
8e86d89
Compare
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 008e7177a65d0ccc03f09d61db2f3ff0d2d26464
|
Thanks @Kaizhe! Are there any plans to add exception support for all the default rules? |
/milestone 0.32.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: leogr, mmoyerfigma The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
/kind rule-update
Any specific area of the project related to this PR?
/area rules
What this PR does / why we need it:
This adds a new macro
user_known_mount_in_privileged_containers
whichallows the easier user-defined exclusions for the "Mount Launched in
Privileged Container" rule.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
N/A
Special notes for your reviewer:
This would be cleaner with exceptions, but this feature is not used in the default ruleset yet, if I understand correctly.
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: