Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add covariance, change fit data, more docs to Euler Deconvolution #519

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 12, 2024

Conversation

leouieda
Copy link
Member

The covariance matrix will be needed to filter solutions in the windowed approach. Change the fit input to receive all the data in a single tuple, like the coordinates. This is more compatible with the rest of Fatiando. Added the checks for fit input and standardizing array shapes so inputs can be n-dimensional. Copied over some of the docstrings from the legacy Fatiando implementation, which expands the theory and provides links to good papers to read.

The covariance matrix will be needed to filter solutions in the windowed
approach. Copied over some of the docstrings from the legacy Fatiando
implementation, which expands the theory and provides links to good
papers to read.
@leouieda
Copy link
Member Author

@Souza-junior I remembered after merging #493 that we had a lot of docs in the old Fatiando that could be copied over. The extra lines at the start of the fit method are used throughout Fatiando to help make all the inputs tuples of 1d arrays, which is easier to handle. They're very useful to allow inputs to be of any shape.

@leouieda
Copy link
Member Author

@Souza-junior could you take a quick look and see what you think?

@Souza-junior
Copy link
Member

@leouieda I'll take a closer look into it.

@leouieda leouieda added this to the v0.7.0 milestone Aug 12, 2024
@Souza-junior
Copy link
Member

@leouieda it looks good!

@santisoler santisoler merged commit bb65829 into main Aug 12, 2024
19 checks passed
@santisoler santisoler deleted the euler-docs branch August 12, 2024 19:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants