Fix bug where using some Pandas dtypes in the output of an ODFV fails

[judahrand]

What this PR does / why we need it:

• When the DataFrame returned by an ODFV UDF uses dtypes like pd.Int64Dtype() type mapping fails.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

[feast-ci-bot]

@judahrand: Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[feast-ci-bot]

Hi @judahrand. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a feast-dev member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #1994 (61b84fd) into master (704c247) will increase coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1994      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   81.97%   82.00%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          99      101       +2     
  Lines        7922     8108     +186     
==========================================
+ Hits         6494     6649     +155     
- Misses       1428     1459      +31     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	74.36% <100.00%> (+0.07%)	⬆️
unittests	58.86% <25.00%> (-0.66%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
sdk/python/feast/type_map.py	72.59% <100.00%> (ø)
...tegration/feature_repos/universal/feature_views.py	97.29% <100.00%> (+0.07%)	⬆️
...fline_store/test_universal_historical_retrieval.py	99.41% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
...istration/test_universal_odfv_feature_inference.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
sdk/python/feast/feature_store.py	88.00% <0.00%> (-3.34%)	⬇️
sdk/python/feast/infra/online_stores/sqlite.py	96.51% <0.00%> (-2.33%)	⬇️
sdk/python/feast/infra/provider.py	89.43% <0.00%> (-0.57%)	⬇️
sdk/python/feast/infra/aws.py	39.26% <0.00%> (-0.41%)	⬇️
sdk/python/feast/cli.py	38.21% <0.00%> (-0.30%)	⬇️
sdk/python/feast/flags.py	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 19 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 704c247...61b84fd. Read the comment docs.

[judahrand]

Can I have an ok-to-test label? I can't run the tests locally so this is the only way I can progress.

[adchia]

/ok-to-test

[judahrand]

This looks good to go to me.

[adchia]

/lgtm

[feast-ci-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: adchia, judahrand

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [adchia]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[felixwang9817]

/kind bug