-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 998
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add feast-python-server helm chart #2177
Add feast-python-server helm chart #2177
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Michelle Rascati <[email protected]>
Hi @michelle-rascati-sp. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a feast-dev member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/ok-to-test |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2177 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 84.59% 84.58% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 102 102
Lines 8186 8186
==========================================
- Hits 6925 6924 -1
- Misses 1261 1262 +1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: adchia, michelle-rascati-sp The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Signed-off-by: Michelle Rascati [email protected]
Adding a helm chart for the feast python server.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
None
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: