fix: Revert snowflake

[kevjumba]

What this PR does / why we need it:
@sfc-gh-madkins I think the snowflake PR was merged in prematurely and we've decided to revert it first. I think there's some other issues that need to be addressed/ just general reviews from team members.

Please reopen the PR and give us a chance to do a more thorough review first!

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #2907 (f63f8a3) into master (0159f38) will decrease coverage by 21.36%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2907       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   80.68%   59.31%   -21.37%     
===========================================
  Files         178      177        -1     
  Lines       15837    15679      -158     
===========================================
- Hits        12778     9300     -3478     
- Misses       3059     6379     +3320     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	?
unittests	59.31% <0.00%> (+0.26%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
sdk/python/feast/infra/utils/snowflake_utils.py	24.13% <0.00%> (-53.64%)	⬇️
...ts/integration/feature_repos/repo_configuration.py	55.74% <ø> (-30.05%)	⬇️
.../integration/online_store/test_online_retrieval.py	16.84% <0.00%> (-83.16%)	⬇️
sdk/python/tests/utils/online_read_write_test.py	19.35% <0.00%> (-80.65%)	⬇️
...fline_store/test_universal_historical_retrieval.py	23.80% <0.00%> (-76.20%)	⬇️
.../integration/online_store/test_universal_online.py	17.82% <0.00%> (-73.42%)	⬇️
...ts/integration/offline_store/test_offline_write.py	27.11% <0.00%> (-72.89%)	⬇️
...dk/python/tests/integration/e2e/test_validation.py	27.77% <0.00%> (-71.43%)	⬇️
...ests/integration/e2e/test_python_feature_server.py	28.78% <0.00%> (-71.22%)	⬇️
sdk/python/feast/wait.py	23.52% <0.00%> (-70.59%)	⬇️
... and 78 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 0159f38...f63f8a3. Read the comment docs.

[sfc-gh-madkins]

@kevjumba Yes this was a fat finger merge for #2902

However, #2903 was a code error @adchia and I had found. What is your problem with that one?

[achals]

Agreed #2903 shouldn't be reverted

[felixwang9817]

/lgtm

[feast-ci-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: felixwang9817, kevjumba

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [felixwang9817,kevjumba]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment