-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 998
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bugfix: Re-applying of featuresets does not update label changes #857
Bugfix: Re-applying of featuresets does not update label changes #857
Conversation
/retest |
* | ||
* @param featureSpec {@link FeatureSpec} containing schema changes. | ||
*/ | ||
public void updateFromProto(FeatureSpec featureSpec) { | ||
this.setLabels(TypeConversion.convertMapToJsonString(featureSpec.getLabelsMap())); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
shouldn't we apply update after isArchived check?
@@ -314,9 +314,10 @@ public void updateFromProto(FeatureSetProto.FeatureSet featureSetProto) | |||
spec.getEntitiesList(), existingEntities)); | |||
} | |||
|
|||
// 4. Update max age and source. | |||
// 4. Update max age, source and labels. | |||
maxAgeSeconds = spec.getMaxAge().getSeconds(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
could please add this.
here as well
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
adding for source as well.
@@ -314,9 +314,10 @@ public void updateFromProto(FeatureSetProto.FeatureSet featureSetProto) | |||
spec.getEntitiesList(), existingEntities)); | |||
} | |||
|
|||
// 4. Update max age and source. | |||
// 4. Update max age, source and labels. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks like numbering is broken. should be 2.
/retest |
2 similar comments
/retest |
/retest |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: pyalex, terryyylim The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/lgtm |
What this PR does / why we need it:
Currently, when we reapply featuresets to add/remove labels from featureset or features, the changes made to labels are not propagated.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: