Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Option to suppress plugin on-run compatibility warnings #2426

Conversation

itowlson
Copy link
Contributor

@itowlson itowlson commented Apr 4, 2024

Put it in your profile and never think about it again.

Until someone reports a weird bug with malformed JSON that you just can't reproduce on your local machine. Then think about it a lot. (Yes, this would have bitten me nastily with the launch metadata work for multi-trigger, and that's why I remain in two minds about it.)

Copy link
Member

@vdice vdice left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Any thoughts on discoverability of this env var for users?

Too heavyweight to pair with a new flag eg --suppress-plugin-compatibility-warnings? If that was in place, clap would also show the env var value, right?

Or maybe just a docs mention?

Or just keep it as-is on a need-to-know basis only? 🤫

@itowlson
Copy link
Contributor Author

itowlson commented Apr 4, 2024

I considered mirroring it to a flag but who is ever going to type out the flag? This is really for "I live on Spin prereleases/canaries and I know it" people - it's completely irrelevant for stable. But yeah maybe discoverability and/or programmatic use justify it. Still would feel weird to see it on stable. I dunno.

@vdice
Copy link
Member

vdice commented Apr 4, 2024

👍 Let's get this in as-is and we can always increase awareness if requested.

@fibonacci1729 fibonacci1729 merged commit 096a32c into fermyon:main Apr 9, 2024
14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants